首页> 外文期刊>Social Sciences in China >On the “criterion” of proof in capital cases and the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law
【24h】

On the “criterion” of proof in capital cases and the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law

机译:论死刑案件中证据的“标准”与《刑事诉讼法》的修订

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

“” : To guarantee quality in capital cases, the first essential is to ensure substantive justice, which means that there must be no problems with regard to the facts and evidence in the case. In ensuring that there is no qualitative problem with either the facts or the evidence in capital cases, the first consideration is that there should be no chance of an irretrievable error. At the same time, it is necessary to forestall any unforgivable miscarriages of justice. To do this, it is necessary to meet the “criterion of proof” for imposing a death sentence, that is, the requirements for proof. As the requirements for proof can only be guaranteed by adequate procedures, China's Criminal Procedure Law needs to improve its handling of procedures relating to capital cases.
机译:“”:要保证死刑案件的质量,首先要确保实质正义,这意味着案件的事实和证据必须没有任何问题。在确保死刑案件中事实或证据不存在质的问题时,首先要考虑的是,不应有无法挽回的错误的机会。同时,必须防止任何不可原谅的司法不公。为此,必须满足判处死刑的“证明标准”,即证明要求。由于举证要求只能通过适当的程序来保证,因此,中国的《刑事诉讼法》需要改进对死刑案件程序的处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号