首页> 外文期刊>Social science computer review >The Effects of Cash, Electronic, and Paper Gift Certificates as Respondent Incentives for a Web-Based Survey of Technologically Sophisticated Respondents
【24h】

The Effects of Cash, Electronic, and Paper Gift Certificates as Respondent Incentives for a Web-Based Survey of Technologically Sophisticated Respondents

机译:现金,电子和纸质礼品券对基于技术的受访者进行基于网络的调查的受访者激励的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An experiment was conducted to determine the effectiveness of three invitation and incentive combinations in a web-based survey. A stratified convenience sample of 434 researchers who were target users of a collaboratory for earthquake engineering was randomly divided into three experi mental conditions: (a) a $5 bill sent with the survey instructions via first class mail, (b) a $5 gift certificate code to Ama zon.com sent with the survey instructions via first-class mail, or (c) a $5 gift certificate code to Amazon . com sent with the survey instructions via e-mail. Overall response was 43%. Results show that $5 bills led to significantly higher response rates than either gift certificate condition (57% for cash vs. 36% for the two gift certificate conditions, χ~2 (1) = 9.3, p < .01). This suggests that cash is a superior incentive for an online survey, even with technologically sophisticated respondents. This may be due to the perceived limitations, delayed payoff, or reduced visibility of online gift certificates.
机译:进行了一项实验,以确定基于网络的调查中三个邀请和激励组合的有效性。 434名研究人员的分层便利样本是地震工程合作单位的目标用户,被随机分为三种实验条件:(a)5美元的钞票和调查说明通过头等邮件发送,(b)5美元的礼券代码通过一流的邮件将调查指示发送给Ama zon.com,或(c)将5美元的礼券代码发送给Amazon。 com通过电子邮件发送了调查说明。总体回应为43%。结果显示,5美元面额的纸币的响应率大大高于任何一种礼券条件(现金为57%,而两种礼券条件为36%,χ〜2(1)= 9.3,p <.01)。这表明,即使对于技术娴熟的受访者而言,现金也是进行在线调查的绝佳诱因。这可能是由于感知的局限性,延迟的付款或降低了在线礼券的可见性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号