首页> 外文期刊>Social science computer review >Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups
【24h】

Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups

机译:面对面,在线视听和在线纯文本焦点小组之间的数据丰富度折衷

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study offers an examination of data richness (i.e., topic-related data, topic unrelated data, researcher ratings of data richness, word count, and linguistic characteristics of data richness) trade-offs between face-to-face (FTF), online text-only and online audiovisual focus group mediums. Two focus group sessions were held for each type of medium. Data were analyzed using systematic content analysis and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Findings showed that although online audiovisual focus groups show potential for producing data similar in richness to FTF focus groups, researchers should carefully consider the potential distractions that manifested in this study as a result of the medium itself, likely due to its novelty as a group communication medium. Online text-only groups did not facilitate rich data, as operationalized in this study, and also had a lower amount of data related to the topic of the groups due to more socializing and off-topic discussion. As the first study to empirically examine the potential of data from focus groups facilitated via webcam (online audiovisual), it concludes, the technology offers similar data richness to FTF focus groups.
机译:这项研究提供了数据丰富度(即与主题相关的数据,与主题无关的数据,研究人员对数据丰富度的评级,单词计数以及数据丰富度的语言特征)之间的权衡取舍,在线研究纯文本和在线视听焦点小组媒体。每种媒体都举行了两次焦点小组会议。使用系统的内容分析以及语言查询和字数统计来分析数据。研究结果表明,尽管在线视听焦点小组显示出产生与FTF焦点小组相似的数据的潜力,但研究人员应仔细考虑由于媒介本身而在本研究中表现出的潜在干扰,这可能是由于其作为小组交流的新颖性介质。如本研究中所操作的那样,仅纯文本的在线小组并不能促进丰富的数据,并且由于更多的社交和非主题讨论,与小组主题相关的数据量也较少。结论是,作为第一项通过经验检查网络摄像头(在线视听)促进的焦点小组的数据潜力的研究,该技术为FTF焦点小组提供了类似的数据丰富性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号