...
首页> 外文期刊>Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest >Sub-National Movements and the Framing of Regional Trade Agreements: Evidence from the EU and NAFTA
【24h】

Sub-National Movements and the Framing of Regional Trade Agreements: Evidence from the EU and NAFTA

机译:次国家运动与区域贸易协定的制定:来自欧盟和北美自由贸易协定的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

How have secessionist and autonomous movements reacted to regional trade agreements (RTAs)? Existing research focuses on the European Union (EU) and, taking a top-down perspective, argues that the EU has done little to help those movements affirm themselves. Adopting a more bottom-up and comparative approach, we propose that RTAs have functioned as political opportunity structures at the international level and that movements have skillfully framed them to define for themselves and their audiences, their grievances, identity, and vision for the future. Movements have followed two basic approaches. Some have embraced RTAs to denounce the debilitating grips of national governments on their people, project an image of themselves as cosmopolitan and modern players, and depict a future in which their communities thrive as successful players in the international community. Others have rejected RTAs to make clear what is wrong and corrupt about the world, present themselves as protectors of local identities and traditions, and promote a vision of the future in which their communities flourish while shielded from excessive interference from the outside. Movements from the left and right ends of the political spectrum have adopted each approach according to their own specific profiles. Evidence comes from the Lega Nord in Italy, the Zapatistas in Mexico, Converg?¨ncia i Uni?3 in Spain, and the Quebecois nationalists in Canada. This article concludes with reflections on the relationship between movements and international political opportunity structures, and lines for future research.View full textDownload full textKeywordsSub-national movements, framing, regional trade agreements, international political opportunity structuresRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2011.590027
机译:分裂主义和自治运动对区域贸易协定(RTA)有何反应?现有研究集中在欧洲联盟(EU)上,并且以自上而下的观点认为,欧盟在帮助这些运动肯定自己方面做得很少。我们建议采用一种自下而上和比较性的方法,认为区域贸易协定在国际一级起着政治机会结构的作用,并且运动已经巧妙地将其构架为自己和他们的听众,他们的不满,身份和对未来的愿景。运动遵循两种基本方法。有些人接受了区域贸易协定,以谴责各国政府对人民的衰弱影响,树立自己作为国际大都会和现代参与者的形象,并描绘其社区在国际社会中成功扮演成功者的未来。其他人则拒绝RTAs来阐明世界上的错误和腐败,将自己摆在当地身份和传统的保护者面前,并提倡对未来的愿景,即他们的社区在蓬勃发展的同时免受外界的过度干扰。政治各界的左派和右派运动根据自己的具体情况采用了每种方法。证据来自意大利的Lega Nord,墨西哥的Zapatistas,西班牙的Converg?ncia i Uni?3和加拿大的魁北克民族主义者。本文以对运动与国际政治机会结构之间的关系以及未来研究的思路进行了总结。查看全文下载全文关键字次国家运动,框架,区域贸易协定,国际政治机会结构相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒&弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2011.590027

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号