...
首页> 外文期刊>Insectes Sociaux >Cutters, carriers and transport chains: Distance-dependent foraging strategies in the grass-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri
【24h】

Cutters, carriers and transport chains: Distance-dependent foraging strategies in the grass-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri

机译:刀具,运输工具和运输链:割草蚁Atta vollenweideri中与距离有关的觅食策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Most studies on leaf-cutting ant foraging examined forest species that harvest dicot leaves. We investigated division of labor and task partitioning during foraging in the grass-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri. Workers of this species harvest grass fragments and transport them to the nest for distances up to 150 m along well-established trunk trails. We recorded the behavior of foraging ants while cutting and monitored the transport of individually-marked fragments from the cutting site until they reached the nest. A. vollenweideri foragers showed division of labor between cutting and carrying, with larger workers cutting the fragments, and smaller ones transporting them. This division was less marked when plants were located very close to the nest and no physical trail was present, i.e., the cutter often transported its own fragment back to the nest. On long foraging trails, the transport of fragments was a partitioned task, i.e., workers formed transport chains composed of 2 to 5 carriers. This sequential load transport occurred more often on long than on short trails. The first carriers in a transport chain covered only short distances before dropping their fragments, and they were observed to turn back and revisit the patch. The last carriers covered the longest distance. The probability of dropping the carried fragment on the trail was independent of both worker and fragment size, and there was no particular location on the trail for dropping, i.e., fragments were not cached. Transport time of fragments transported by a chain was longer than for those transported by single workers all the way to the nest, i.e., sequential transport did not save foraging time. Two hypotheses concerning the possible adaptive value of transport chains are discussed. The first one argues that sequential transport may lead to an increased material transport rate compared to individual transport. The second one considers sequential transport as a way to enhance the information flow among foragers, thus leading to a quicker build-up of workers at particular harvesting places. It is suggested that rather than increasing the gross transport rate of material, transport via chains may favor the transfer of information about the kind of resource being actually harvested.
机译:关于切叶蚂蚁觅食的大多数研究都对收获双子叶植物的森林物种进行了研究。我们调查了草蚂蚁Atta vollenweideri在觅食期间的分工和任务分配。该物种的工人收获草屑并将其沿着成熟的树干步道运送到巢穴,最远可达150 m。我们记录了切割时觅食蚂蚁的行为,并监控了各个标记的碎片从切割部位的运输直到它们到达巢穴。 A. vollenweideri的觅食者在切割和搬运之间表现出分工,较大的工人切割碎片,而较小的工人运输碎片。当植物离巢非常近并且没有物理痕迹时,即切割者经常将其自身的碎片运回巢中时,这种划分就没有那么明显了。在漫长的觅食小径上,碎片的运输是分工的,即工人形成了由2到5个运输车组成的运输链。这种顺序的负载传输发生在长途而不是短途。运输链中的第一个载体在掉落碎片之前只覆盖了很短的距离,并且观察到它们会转回去并重新查看补丁。最后的载具覆盖了最长的距离。将携带的碎片丢在路径上的可能性与工作人员和碎片大小无关,并且在路径上没有特定的位置可放置,即未缓存碎片。由链条运输的碎片的运输时间要比由单个工人一路运输到巢穴的碎片的运输时间更长,即顺序运输不能节省觅食时间。讨论了有关运输链可能的适应性价值的两个假设。第一个论点认为,相继运输可能比单独运输导致增加的材料运输速度。第二种方法认为顺序运输是增强觅食者之间信息流动的一种方式,从而导致在特定收割地更快地积累工人。建议通过链式运输而不是增加物料的总运输率,而可能有利于传递有关实际收获的资源种类的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号