首页> 外文期刊>Small-scale Forestry >Sustaining Participatory Forest Management: Case Study Analyses of Forestry Assistance from Tanzania, Mozambique, Laos and Vietnam
【24h】

Sustaining Participatory Forest Management: Case Study Analyses of Forestry Assistance from Tanzania, Mozambique, Laos and Vietnam

机译:维持参与性森林管理:来自坦桑尼亚,莫桑比克,老挝和越南的林业援助案例分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper introduces case study analysis against an illustrative model, the ‘house model’, which contains a number of key elements for sustaining participatory forest management (PFM). In theory, the elements in the model are basic requirements for ensuring that the participation of local people in forest management will continue after external donor support ceases. In practice, the study shows that none of the four case study projects managed to build the whole ‘house’ nor did they have tangible impacts on all the elements, and long-term sustainability of PFM is still questionable. All four donor-supported projects had limited tangible impacts on access to information and benefits, especially with regards to long-term extension services, markets and marketing information. These were the most difficult elements to influence during and after the projects in all four cases. It is concluded that in order to sustain PFM, there needs to be a solid institutional foundation which as a minimum ensures local people’s access to information and benefits from forests under the PFM.
机译:本文介绍了针对说明性模型“房屋模型”的案例研究分析,该模型包含维持参与性森林管理(PFM)的许多关键要素。从理论上讲,该模型的要素是确保在外部捐助者支持停止后,当地人继续参与森林管理的基本要求。在实践中,该研究表明,这四个案例研究项目都没有设法建造整个“房屋”,也没有对所有要素产生明显影响,因此PFM的长期可持续性仍然值得怀疑。所有四个由捐助者支持的项目对获取信息和收益的具体影响有限,特别是在长期推广服务,市场和营销信息方面。在所有四个案例中,这些都是在项目期间和之后影响最困难的因素。结论是,为了维持PFM,需要有一个坚实的制度基础,这至少要确保当地人民在PFM下获得森林的信息和利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号