首页> 外文期刊>Shore and beach >Factors controlling longshore variations of beach changes induced by Tropical Storm Eta (2020) along Pinellas County beaches, west-central Florida
【24h】

Factors controlling longshore variations of beach changes induced by Tropical Storm Eta (2020) along Pinellas County beaches, west-central Florida

机译:控制热带风暴ETA(2020年)沿着佛罗里达州西部的Pinellas County海滩(2020)引起的海滩变化的因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Tropical Storm Eta impacted the coast of west-central Florida from 11 November to 12 November 2020 and generated high waves over elevated water levels for over 20 hours. A total of 148 beach and nearshore profiles, spaced about 300 m (984 ft) apart, were surveyed one to two weeks before and one to eight days after the storm to examine the beach changes along four barrier islands, including Sand Key, Treasure Island, Long Key, and Mullet Key. The high storm waves superimposed on elevated water level reached the toe of dunes or seawalls and caused dune erosion and overwash at various places. Throughout most of the coast, the dune, dry beach, and nearshore area was eroded and most of the sediment was deposited on the seaward slope of the nearshore bar, resulting in a roughly conserved sand volume above closure depth. The longshore variation of beach-profile volume loss demonstrates an overall southward decreasing trend, mainly due to a southward decreasing nearshore wave height as controlled by offshore bathymetry and shoreline configurations. The Storm Erosion Index (SEI) developed by Miller and Livermont (2008) captured the longshore variation of beach-profile volume loss reasonably well. The longshore variation of breaking wave height is the dominant factor controlling the longshore changes of SEI and beach erosion. Temporal variation of water level also played a significant role, while beach berm elevation was a minor factor. Although wider beaches tended to experience more volume loss from TS Eta due to the availability of sediment, they were effective in protecting the back beach and dune area from erosion. On the other hand, smaller profile-volume loss from narrow beach did not necessarily relate to less dune/ structure damage. The opposite is often true. Accurate evaluation of a storm's severity in terms of erosion potential would benefit beach management especially under the circumstance of increasing storm activities due to climate change.
机译:热带风暴ETA从11月11日到11月11日到11月12日的佛罗里达州西部海岸影响,并在20多小时内产生高升高的水平。共有148个海滩和近岸型材,间隔约300米(984英尺),在暴风雨前一到两周以前一到两周,以检查海滩沿四个屏障群岛的变化,包括沙龙,金银岛,长键和mullet键。叠加在升高的水位上的高风暴波达到了沙丘或海堤的脚趾,并在各个地方引起了沙丘侵蚀和透露。在大多数海岸,沙丘,干燥的海滩和近岸区域被侵蚀,大部分沉积物都沉积在近岸杆的海边,导致封闭深度粗糙的砂体积。海滩轮廓体积损失的龙岸变化展示了整体南方下降趋势,主要是由于沿海浴室和海岸线配置控制的近岸波浪高度的南部近岸波浪高度。由Miller和Livermont开发的暴风雨侵蚀指数(SEI)(2008年)捕获了相当良好的海滩型体积损失的龙岸变化。破碎波高的龙岸变异是控制SEI和海滩侵蚀的龙岸变化的主导因素。水位的时间变化也起到了重要作用,而海滩浸渍率为较小的因素。虽然由于沉积物的可用性,宽广的海滩往往受到TS ETA的更多体积损失,但它们有效地保护后海滩和沙丘区域免受侵蚀。另一方面,狭窄海滩的较小轮廓损失不一定与较少的沙丘/结构损坏有关。相反的往往是真的。准确评估风暴在侵蚀潜力方面的严重程度会使海滩管理受益,特别是由于气候变化增加了风暴活动的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号