...
首页> 外文期刊>Sequential analysis >House-Hunting Without Second Moments
【24h】

House-Hunting Without Second Moments

机译:没有第二刻的房屋狩猎

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the house-hunting problem, i.i.d. random variables, X_1,X_2,... are observed sequentially at a cost of c > 0 per observation. The problem is to choose a stopping rule, N, to maximize E(X_N - Nc). If the X's have a finite second moment, the optimal stopping rule is N~* = min{n ≥ 1 : X_n > V~*}, where V* satisfies E(X - V~*)~+ = c. The statement of the problem and its solution requires only the first moment of the X_n to be finite. Is a finite second moment really needed? In 1970, Herbert Robbins showed, assuming only a finite first moment, that the rule N~* is optimal within the class of stopping rules, N, such that E(X_N - Nc)~- > - ∞, but it is not clear that this restriction of the class of stopping rules is really required. In this article it is shown that this restriction is needed, but that if the expectation is replaced by a generalized expectation, N~* is optimal out of all stopping rules assuming only first moments.
机译:在找房子的问题上顺序观察随机变量X_1,X_2,...,每次观察的代价为c> 0。问题在于选择一个停止规则N来最大化E(X_N-Nc)。如果X具有有限的第二矩,则最佳停止规则为N〜* = min {n≥1:X_n> V〜*},其中V *满足E(X-V〜*)〜+ = c。问题及其解决方案的陈述仅要求X_n的第一刻是有限的。真的需要一个有限的第二刻吗? 1970年,赫伯特·罗宾斯(Herbert Robbins)仅在有限的第一时刻就表明,规则N〜*在停止规则N类中是最优的,因此E(X_N-Nc)〜->-∞,但尚不清楚确实需要限制规则类别的限制。在本文中,表明了此限制的必要性,但是如果将期望替换为广义期望,则在仅假设第一时刻的所有停止规则中,N〜*是最优的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号