...
首页> 外文期刊>Sensors Journal, IEEE >A Comparison Between Sensor Signal Preprocessing Techniques
【24h】

A Comparison Between Sensor Signal Preprocessing Techniques

机译:传感器信号预处理技术之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The need for the use of sensor networks in ever more efficient manner drives research methods for better information management. It would be useful to decrease the amount of managed data. Often, we are interested in few noteworthy information of a signal (for example, period, amplitude, time constant, steady state value, and so on) not in the whole waveform. The idea is to take less data, but acquire the same information. In a highly oversampled signal, each single sample does not carry a lot of information. From this point, two different algorithms are compared, in which only few samples are stored or transferred. This paper describes these two algorithms: 1) the first one is the segmentation and labeling algorithm, also proposed for the definition of the new standard of the IEEE 1451 and 2) the second one is based on compressive sensing theory. These two algorithms are compared, the simulations results are shown, and it is discussed which case could be more suitable for.
机译:以越来越有效的方式使用传感器网络的需求推动了研究方法的发展,以实现更好的信息管理。减少托管数据量将很有用。通常,我们对信号的一些值得注意的信息(例如,周期,幅度,时间常数,稳态值等)感兴趣,而不是整个波形。想法是减少数据,但获取相同的信息。在高度过采样的信号中,每个样本都不会携带很多信息。从这一点出发,比较了两种不同的算法,其中仅存储或传输了很少的样本。本文介绍了这两种算法:1)第一种是分段和标记算法,也为定义IEEE 1451的新标准而提出; 2)第二种是基于压缩感测理论的。比较了这两种算法,显示了仿真结果,并讨论了哪种情况更适合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号