...
首页> 外文期刊>Securities Regulation Law Journal >Important Developments in Securities Litigation in 2008
【24h】

Important Developments in Securities Litigation in 2008

机译:2008年证券诉讼的重要进展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In 2008, we have witnessed significant activity in the field of securities litigation, fueled in part by an increased number of class action filings over prior years. The year began with an important decision from the United States Supreme Court, Stoneridge Investment Partners LLC v, Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., which has been called the most important securities decision of this generation. As discussed below, that opinion reinforced for the benefit of all potential defendants the mandatory requirement of pleading reliance separately as to each defendant's statements or conduct. Another important development this year has been the proliferation of securities claims arising out of the ongoing subprime mortgage/credit crisis. Courts are beginning to rule on motions to dismiss in these cases and, thus, we now know which arguments have proven to be most successful for defendants. And finally we will address recent trends in Delaware corporate law regarding issues of standing to bring suit, the need to plead demand futility, and how courts have resolved recent M&A cases.
机译:2008年,我们目睹了证券诉讼领域的重要活动,部分原因是前几年的集体诉讼备案数量增加。这一年始于美国最高法院的一项重要决定,即Stoneridge Investment Partners LLC诉Scientific-Atlanta,Inc.,这被称为这一代最重要的证券决定。如下所述,该意见强化了所有潜在被告人的利益,即对每个被告人的陈述或行为分别辩护的强制性要求。今年的另一个重要发展是不断发生的次级抵押贷款/信用危机引起的证券债权激增。法院已开始就驳回这些案件的动议作出裁决,因此,我们现在知道哪种论点对被告最为成功。最后,我们将探讨特拉华州公司法的最新趋势,包括提起诉讼的资格,对诉求徒劳的诉求以及法院如何解决最近的并购案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号