...
首页> 外文期刊>Seaways >Seaways, seamanship and common sense safety
【24h】

Seaways, seamanship and common sense safety

机译:航道,航海技术和常识安全

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Nautical Institute's Chief Executive recently highlighted a feeling among members that articles in Seaways are often focused on academic and technical issues (Focus, February 2016). The fact that this trend has been identified is a very positive step for The Nautical Institute and the marine industry in general. However, it is only the start. I would suggest that not only does there need to be a shift in focus in the content within Seaways, but there also needs to be a re-adjustment in the demographic of those who contribute. Historically, the majority of articles have been written by members (like me) who have worked at sea, but who have now been ashore for many years and are, however much we try and remain connected, remote from the day to day activities of operating a ship. We have experience and we have the fundamental knowledge, but we lack the recent sailing time. We can see the pressures and constraints on today's crews, but we don't necessarily fully understand or appreciate them. This change can be facilitated by the editorial and management staff of The Nautical Institute, but we, as members, are the ones who must drive the shift in focus.
机译:航海学院的首席执行官最近强调了成员之间的一种感觉,即《航道》中的文章经常侧重于学术和技术问题(2016年2月,聚焦)。对于航海学院和整个海洋产业来说,已经识别出这种趋势是非常积极的一步。但是,这仅仅是开始。我建议,不仅需要在Seaways中转移内容的重点,而且还需要对贡献者的人口结构进行重新调整。从历史上看,大多数文章是由在海上工作的成员(如我)撰写的,但是他们已经在岸上工作了很多年,并且无论我们多么努力并保持联系,他们都远离日常的运营活动一艘船。我们有经验,也有基础知识,但是我们缺乏最近的航行时间。我们可以看到当今工作人员面临的压力和约束,但我们不一定完全理解或欣赏它们。航海学院的编辑和管理人员可以促进这种变化,但是作为成员,我们是必须推动重点转移的人。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Seaways》 |2016年第4期|14-15|共2页
  • 作者

    Gary Ritchie;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号