首页> 外文期刊>Scientometrics >BLIND REVIEW OF RESEARCH PROPOSALS IN KOREA: ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND FACTORS AFFECTING APPLICANT DETECTION
【24h】

BLIND REVIEW OF RESEARCH PROPOSALS IN KOREA: ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND FACTORS AFFECTING APPLICANT DETECTION

机译:韩国研究计划的盲文审查:其有效性和影响申请人检测的因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article addresses the potential effectiveness of blind review in selecting and funding research proposals in a "scientifically small" country. By analyzing 474 responses of the blinded reviewers ever worked for Korea Science and Engineering Fund, it was found that blind review is fairly effective. About two thirds of the blinded reviewers were unable to recognize the applicants accurately. The applicant detection was affected by (1) physical age, (2) professional experience, and (3) geographical location of doctoral education of the applicants, (4) review experience, (5) rank of employing universities of the reviewers, and (6) similarity of research interest between an applicant and a reviewer. It was also found that blind review was more strongly advocated by those who had made a wrong guess or who had given up guessing. Implications of the findings and future research directions were discussed.
机译:本文讨论了在“科学小国”中盲目评审在选择和资助研究计划中的潜在有效性。通过分析曾在韩国科学与工程基金会工作过的474位盲审者的反馈,发现盲审相当有效。大约三分之二的盲审者无法准确识别申请人。申请人的选择受到以下因素的影响:(1)年龄,(2)专业经验和(3)申请人的博士教育地理位置,(4)审查经验,(5)审查者的聘用大学排名以及( 6)申请人与审稿人之间研究兴趣的相似性。还发现,做出错误猜测或放弃猜测的人更加强烈地主张盲目复习。讨论了研究结果的含义和未来的研究方向。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Scientometrics》 |1999年第1期|17-31|共15页
  • 作者

    M.LEE; K.OM.J.KOH;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 计量学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:48:05

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号