...
首页> 外文期刊>Scientific studies of reading >Differences in the Processing of Prefixes and Suffixes Revealed by a Letter-Search Task
【24h】

Differences in the Processing of Prefixes and Suffixes Revealed by a Letter-Search Task

机译:字母搜索任务显示的处理前缀和后缀的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A letter-search task was used to test the hypothesis that affixes are chunked during morphological processing and that such chunking might operate differently for prefixes and suffixes. Participants had to detect a letter target that was embedded either in a prefix or suffix (e.g., 'R' in propoint or filmure) or in a non-prefix beginning or non-suffix ending (e.g., 'R' in cropoint or filmire). Prefixed and suffixed letter-strings comprised real stems and affixes but never formed a real word. Effects of letter cluster frequency were also investigated by manipulating the frequency of non-affix beginnings and endings. Letter search took longer in suffixes compared with non-suffix endings but not for prefixes compared with non-prefix beginnings. Moreover, performance was not affected by letter cluster frequency. We interpret our findings in the light of recent accounts of morpho-orthographic segmentation and the different function of prefixes and suffixes.
机译:使用字母搜索任务来测试以下假说:词缀在形态处理过程中被分块,并且这种分块对于前缀和后缀可能有不同的作用。参与者必须检测嵌入在前缀或后缀(例如,propoint或胶片中的“ R”)或非前缀开头或非后缀结尾(例如,cropoint或filmire中的“ R”)中的字母目标。带有前缀和后缀的字母字符串包含真实的词根和词缀,但从未形成真实的单词。字母簇频率的影响也通过操纵非词缀开始和结束的频率进行了研究。与非后缀相比,字母搜索在后缀中花费的时间更长,但与非前缀开始相比,前缀搜索所花费的时间更长。而且,性能不受字母簇频率的影响。我们根据最近的词法正字分割分析以及前缀和后缀的不同功能来解释我们的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号