【24h】

Response

机译:响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Our policy forum aimed to highlight several challenges to implementing a pan-European Invasive Species Strategy, one of which is how best to prioritize invasive species for blacklisting. Among many potential criteria used to blacklist species (7), we would argue against making an allowance for species conservation status in the native territory or the potential economic value in the introduced region. If a species is perceived as a pest where introduced, it will often be blacklisted, regardless of its conservation status in its native range. Two of our examples of native European species that are invasive elsewhere in Europe are either Red Listed (2) or classified as nationally threatened (3), but this has not stemmed eradication attempts in the places where they are considered invasive.
机译:我们的政策论坛旨在强调实施泛欧洲入侵物种战略的若干挑战,其中之一就是如何最好地将入侵物种列入黑名单。在用于将物种列入黑名单的许多潜在标准中(7),我们将反对在原产地保护物种的保护地位或在引入地区的潜在经济价值。如果某个物种在引入时被视为有害生物,则无论其在本国范围内的保护状况如何,通常都会将其列入黑名单。我们在欧洲其他地方入侵的欧洲本土物种的两个例子被列入红色名录(2)或被列为受到国家威胁的物种(3),但这并未阻止在被认为具有入侵性的地方进行根除的尝试。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science》 |2009年第5930期|1015-1016|共2页
  • 作者单位

    The Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University,Post Office Box 84, Canterbury, New Zealand;

    Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland;

    Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-252 43 Pruhonice,Czech Republic Department of Ecology, Charles University, CZ-128 01 Vinicna 7, Prague, Czech Republic.;

    Estacion Biologica de Donana (EBD-CSIC), Avinguda Americo Vespucio, E-41092 Sevilla, Spain;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:55:05

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号