【24h】

Response

机译:响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

WE AGREE WITH FORSBERG AND COLLEAGUES that re-consent for new uses of research samples is not always necessary (or even possible) and that respectful engagement goes well beyond consent procedures. As we noted in our Policy Forum and previous work {1, 2), one of the most important findings of studies on participants' views is that many have a positive ongoing interest in the research process. Developing better ways to inform participants about research, and to elicit their input and support, will benefit scientists and participants alike.
机译:我们同意FORSBERG和COLLEAGUES的观点,并非总是有必要(甚至可能)同意研究样品的新用途,并且尊重参与远远超出了同意程序。正如我们在政策论坛和以前的工作{1,2)中所指出的那样,关于参与者观点的研究最重要的发现之一是,许多参与者对研究过程具有持续的积极兴趣。开发更好的方法来告知参与者有关研究的信息,并征求他们的意见和支持,将使科学家和参与者都受益。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science》 |2011年第6027期|p.306|共1页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle 98185, USA;

    Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle 98185, USA;

    Group Health Research Institute, Seattle 98101, USA;

    Department of Medicine,Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington,Seattle 98195, USA;

    Group Health Research Institute, Seattle 98101, USA;

    Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle 98185, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:53:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号