首页> 外文期刊>Science >Will Flu Papers Lead to New Research Oversight?
【24h】

Will Flu Papers Lead to New Research Oversight?

机译:流感论文会导致新的研究监督吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the fall of 2001, just weeks after the trauma of 11 September, letters laced with powdered anthrax caused death and panic in the United States. Ever since, biological scientists have debated whether, one day, the need to keep sensitive information from aspiring bioterror-ists would force them to impose new limits on the academic openness they had long taken for granted. A decade later, that day appears to have arrived. Just before Christmas, the U.S. government announced that a biosecurity advisory board had asked two research teams to strike key details from papers in press at Science and Nature. The studies describe how researchers made the deadly H5N1 avian influenza more transmissible between mammals-possibly providing a blueprint on how to set off a flu pandemic. The researchers and the journals agreed, but only if the U.S. government comes up with a system that allows "responsible" scientists to see the deleted information, which public health experts say could be crucial to monitoring H5N1 outbreaks and developing drugs and vaccines.
机译:2001年秋天,9月11日的创伤发生仅几周后,在信箱上撒满炭疽粉的信件在美国引起死亡和恐慌。从那以后,生物学家们一直在争论是否有朝一日,需要防止有抱负的生物恐怖分子获得敏感信息是否会迫使他们对他们长期以来认为理所当然的学术开放性施加新的限制。十年后,这一天似乎已经到来。圣诞节前夕,美国政府宣布,一个生物安全顾问委员会已要求两个研究小组从《科学与自然》杂志的论文中获取关键细节。这些研究描述了研究人员如何使致命的H5N1禽流感在哺乳动物之间更易传播,可能提供了如何引发流感大流行的蓝图。研究人员和期刊都同意,但前提是美国政府想出一种系统,使“负责任”的科学家能够查看已删除的信息,公共卫生专家说,这对于监控H5N1暴发以及研发药物和疫苗至关重要。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science》 |2012年第6064期|p.2022|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号