首页> 外文期刊>Science of the total environment >Soil greenhouse gas emissions and grazing management in northern temperate grasslands
【24h】

Soil greenhouse gas emissions and grazing management in northern temperate grasslands

机译:北温带草原土壤温室气体排放及放牧管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Adaptive multi-paddock (AMP) grazing, a grazing system in which individual paddocks are grazed for a short duration at a high stock density and followed by a long rest period, is claimed to be an effective tool to sustainably manage and improve grasslands and enhance their ecosystem services. However, whether AMP grazing is superior to conventional grazing (n-AMP) in reducing soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is unclear. Here, we measured CO_2, CH_4, and N_2O fluxes between August 2017 and August 2019 in 12 pairs of AMP vs. n-AMP ranches distributed across an agro-climatic gradient in Alberta, Canada. We found that field GHG fluxes did not differ between AMP and n-AMP grazing systems, but instead were regulated by specific management attributes, environmental conditions, and soil properties, including cattle stocking rate, cultivation history, soil moisture content, and soil bulk density. Specifically, we found that seasonal mean CO_2 emissions increased with increasing cattle stocking rates, while CH_4 uptake was lower in grasslands with a history of cultivation. Seasonal mean CO_2 emissions increased while CH_4 uptake decreased with increasing soil moisture content. In addition, CH_4 uptake decreased with increasing soil bulk density. Observed N_2O emissions were poorly predicted by the management, environmental conditions, and soil properties investigated in our study. We conclude that AMP grazing does not have an advantage over n-AMP grazing in reducing GHG fluxes from grasslands. Future efforts to develop optimal management strategies (e.g., the use of sustainable stocking rates and avoided cultivation) that reduce GHG emissions should also consider the environmental conditions and soil properties unique to every grassland ecosystem.
机译:放牧的自适应多围桨(AMP)放牧,一种放牧系统,其中单独的围场在高股票密度下持续到持续时间,然后是长期休息时间,被要求是可持续管理和改善草原和增强的有效工具他们的生态系统服务。然而,在减少土壤温室气体(GHG)排放时,AMP Grazing是否优于传统的放牧(N-AMP)。在这里,我们在2017年8月至2019年8月的12对AMP与N-AMP牧场之间测量了CO_2,CH_4和N_2O助熔剂在加拿大艾伯塔省的农业气候梯度上分布。我们发现,AMP和N-AMP放牧系统之间的GHG助气体没有差异,而是由特定的管理属性,环境条件和土壤性质进行调节,包括牛库存率,培养历史,土壤水分含量和土壤堆积密度。具体而言,我们发现季节性平均CO_2排放随着养牛率的增加而增加,而CH_4摄取在草地上具有培养史的草地。季节性平均CO_2排放量增加,而CH_4摄取随着土壤水分含量的增加而降低。此外,CH_4摄取随着土壤堆积密度的增加而降低。观察到的N_2O排放受到我们研究中的管理,环境条件和土壤性质的预测不足。我们得出结论,AMP Grazing在减少草原的GHG助气液中,放射线没有达到N-AMP放牧。未来努力开发最佳管理策略(例如,使用可持续库存率和避免培养),减少温室气体排放也应考虑每个草原生态系统独有的环境条件和土壤属性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science of the total environment》 |2021年第20期|148975.1-148975.8|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton AB T6G 2E3 Canada State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol School of Ecology Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou 510275 China;

    Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton AB T6G 2E3 Canada Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Beaverlodge Research Farm Beaverlodge AB T0H 0C0 Canada;

    Department of Agricultural Food and Nutritional Science University of Alberta Edmonton AB T6G 2P5 Canada;

    Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton AB T6G 2E3 Canada;

    Department of Agricultural Food and Nutritional Science University of Alberta Edmonton AB T6G 2P5 Canada;

    Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB T6G 2R3 Canada;

    Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton AB T6G 2E3 Canada;

    Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB T6G 2R3 Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    GHG mitigation; Grazing management; Inter-annual dynamics; Northern temperate grassland; Soil temperature; Soil water;

    机译:温室气体缓解;放牧管理;年间动态;北温带草原;土壤温度;土壤水;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号