首页> 外文期刊>Science of the total environment >Organic carbon bioavailability: Is it a good driver to choose the best biological nitrogen removal process?
【24h】

Organic carbon bioavailability: Is it a good driver to choose the best biological nitrogen removal process?

机译:有机碳生物利用度:它是一种选择最好的生物氮去除过程的好司机吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Organic carbon can affect the biological nitrogen removal process since the Anammox, heterotrophic and denitrifying bacteria have different affinities and feedback in relation to carbon/nitrogen ratio. Therefore, we reviewed the wastewater carbon concentration, its biodegradability and bioavailability to choose the appropriate nitrogen removal process between conventional (nitrification-denitrification) and Anammox-based process (i.e. integrated with the partial nitritation, nitritation, simultaneous partial nitrification and denitrification or partial-denitrification). This review will cover: (i) strategies to choose the best nitrogen removal route according to the wastewater characteristics in relation to the organic matter bioavailability and biodegradability; (ⅱ) strategies to efficiently remove nitrogen and the remaining carbon from effluent in anammox-based process and its operating cost; (ⅲ) an economic analysis to determine the operational costs of two-units Anammox-based process when compared with the commonly applied one-unit Anammox system (partial-nitritation-Anammox). On this review, a list of alternatives are summarized and explained for different nitrogen and biodegradable organic carbon concentrations, which are the main factors to determine the best treatment process, based on operational and economic terms. In summary, it depends on the wastewater carbon biodegradability, which implies in the waste-water treatment cost. Thus, to apply the conventional nitrification/denitrification process a COD_b/N ratio higher than 3.5 is required to achieve full nitrogen removal efficiency. For an economic point of view, according to the analysis the minimum COD_b/gN for successful nitrogen removal by nitrification/denitrification is 5.8 g. If ratios lower than 3.5 are applied, for successfully higher nitrogen removal rates and the economic feasibility of the treatment, Anammox-based routes can be applied to the wastewater treatment plant.
机译:有机碳可以影响生物氮去除过程,因为厌氧,异养和反硝化细菌具有不同的亲和力和关于碳/氮比的反馈。因此,我们审查了废水碳浓度,其生物降解性和生物利用度,以选择常规(硝化反硝化)和基于厌氧的方法之间的合适的氮去除过程(即与部分亚硝化,亚硝化,同时部分硝化和反硝化或部分集成反硝化)。本综述将涵盖:(i)根据有机质生物利用度和生物降解性的废水特性选择最佳氮气去除路线的策略; (Ⅱ)有效地除去氮素基于厌氧工艺流出物的氮气和剩余碳的策略及其运营成本; (Ⅲ)与常用单位厌氧系统(部分亚硝酸盐症)相比,经济分析确定基于双单位厌氧的过程的运营成本。在本综述中,概述了替代品列表,并针对不同的氮和可生物降解的有机碳浓度解释,这是根据运营和经济术语确定最佳治疗过程的主要因素。总之,这取决于废水碳生物降解性,这意味着废水处理成本。因此,为了应用常规的硝化/脱氮过程,需要高于3.5的COD_B / N比以获得全氮去除效率。对于经济的观点来看,根据分析,通过硝化/脱氮成功去除的最小核_b / gn为5.8g。如果应用低于3.5的比率,则为了成功更高的氮气去除率和治疗的经济可行性,基于厌氧的途径可以应用于废水处理厂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号