首页> 外文期刊>Science of the total environment >Group versus individual exposure: Do methodological decisions in aquatic toxicology alter experimental results?
【24h】

Group versus individual exposure: Do methodological decisions in aquatic toxicology alter experimental results?

机译:组与个人暴露:水生毒理学的方法决策改变实验结果吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In aquatic toxicology, methods that are chosen for exposures have profound consequences on experimental outcomes and thus can skew policy initiatives. For example, as compared to single-organism exposures, toxicity test results of group exposures may be impacted by confounding factors such as social interactions between animals or individual variation in accumulation rates. To test for differences in organismal response between group and individual toxicological exposures, we exposed Daphnia magna to copper and subsequently compared the toxicity (median lethal concentration or LC50) between groups and individuals. Results suggested that water chemistry had a larger effect on experimental outcomes than the number of animals exposed in the same tank. Methodological decisions with respect to replication type can affect toxicity tests, and LC50s calculated using different exposure types (such as group and individual exposures) may not be comparable.
机译:在水生毒理学中,选择曝光的方法对实验结果具有深远的后果,因此可以歪曲政策举措。例如,与单生体曝光相比,组暴露的毒性测试结果可能会受到混淆因素的影响,例如动物之间的社交相互作用或积累率的个体变化。为了测试组和个体毒理学曝光之间的有机体反应的差异,我们将Daphnia Magna暴露于铜,随后与群体和个体之间的毒性(中值致死浓度或LC50)进行了比较。结果表明,水化学对实验结果的影响大于在同一罐中暴露的动物的数量。关于复制类型的方法论决定可以影响毒性测试,并且使用不同曝光类型(例如组和各个曝光)计算的LC50可能不可比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号