...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Deposition- and transport-dominated erosion regime effects on the loss of dissolved and sediment-bound organic carbon: Evaluation in a cultivated soil with laboratory rainfall simulations
【24h】

Deposition- and transport-dominated erosion regime effects on the loss of dissolved and sediment-bound organic carbon: Evaluation in a cultivated soil with laboratory rainfall simulations

机译:沉积 - 和运输主导的侵蚀政权对溶解和沉积物结合的有机碳损失的影响:具有实验室降雨模拟的栽培土壤中的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Erosion-induced soil carbon loss has been identified as a critical process in the global carbon (C) cycle. Surface coverage substantially alters the soil erosion process and the effects of net loss or deposition on soil organic C (SOC). However, information on SOC loss induced by soil erosion at the process level is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate how runoff and erosion regimes affect dissolved and sediment-bound organic C (DOC and SBOC) loss. Thus, six simulated rainfall events were conducted on two laboratory plots (9.75 m × 1.83 m) with different surface coverages (17-83%) and coverage distributions (upslope vs. downslope) using polypropylene geotextiles. The results showed that the variability in the process of runoff and sediment yield existed as a result of altered surface coverage over the erosion zone (SS_(erosion zone)) and covered zone (SS_(covered zone)) on the slope. Thus, the erosion regimes can be identified as deposition- and transport-dominated processes, which were the main soil erosion subprocesses. The surface coverage located downslope (SC_(top-bottom) slope) can more efficiently reduce runoff (21.9-85.7%) and sediment (67.6-98.3%) than the SC_(bottom-top) slope (runoff: 20.1-83.0%; sediment: 35.0-93.3%), which has the surface coverage located upslope. DOC (8.0-11.3 mg L~(-1)) and SBOC (0.3-0.5 mg g~(-1)) in the deposition-dominated process on the SC_(top-bottom) slope were higher than in the transport-dominated process on the SC_(bottom-top) slope (DOC: 6.8-10.2 mg L~(-1); SBOC: 0.2-0.3 mg g~(-1)). The loading of DOC and SBOC was largely dependent on runoff and sediment yield, and DOC load contributed 83.9-89.7% of the SOC loss. Overall, laboratory results highlighted the soil C loss at different hydrological and erosion regimes (deposition- vs. transport-dominated process). This study provides important information that can be used to facilitate further implementations such as watershed modeling of soil C dynamics and the corresponding decision-making processes.
机译:侵蚀诱导的土壤碳损失已被鉴定为全球碳(C)循环中的关键过程。表面覆盖率基本上改变了土壤侵蚀过程和净损失或沉积对土壤有机C(SOC)的影响。然而,有关在过程水平造成的土壤侵蚀引起的SOC损失的信息是有限的。本研究的目的是调查径流和侵蚀制度如何影响溶解和沉积的有机C(DOC和SBOC)丧失。因此,在两个实验室图(9.75 m×1.83m)上进行六个模拟降雨事件,使用聚丙烯土工织物(Upslope与下坡)和覆盖分布(Upslope vs.Dowslope)进行。结果表明,由于折叠区(SS_(侵蚀区))和覆盖区域(SS_(覆盖区))和坡度的覆盖区(SS_(覆盖区))和覆盖区域(SS_(覆盖区))的表面覆盖率和沉积物产量的变异性存在于斜率上的变化。因此,可以将侵蚀制度鉴定为沉积和运输主导的方法,其是主要的土壤侵蚀亚过程。位于下坡的表面覆盖率(SC_(顶部)坡度)可以更有效地减少径流(21.9-85.7%)和沉积物(21.9-85.7%)而不是SC_(底层)坡度(径流:20.1-83.0%;沉积物:35.0-93.3%),具有位于上坡的表面覆盖率。 DOC(8.0-11.3mg L〜(-1))和SBOC(0.3-0.5mg g〜(-1))在SC_(顶部底部)坡度上的沉积主导的过程中高于运输主导的过程SC_(底层)坡度的过程(DOC:6.8-10.2 mg L〜(-1); SBOC:0.2-0.3mg g〜(-1))。 DOC和SBOC的装载在很大程度上取决于径流和沉积物产量,DOC负荷占SOC损失的83.9-89.7%。总体而言,实验室结果强调了不同水文和侵蚀制度的土壤C损失(沉积 - 与运输主导的过程)。本研究提供了重要信息,可用于促进进一步实现,例如土壤C动力学的流域建模和相应的决策过程。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Science of the Total Environment》 |2021年第1期|141717.1-141717.10|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems South China Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciences Guangzhou 510650 China USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory 275 S Russell St. West Lafayette IN 47906 USA;

    Blackland Research and Extension Center Texas A&M Agrilife Research Texas A&M University TX 76502 USA;

    College of Land Science and Technology China Agricultural University Beijing 100193 China;

    USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory 275 S Russell St. West Lafayette IN 47906 USA;

    USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory 275 S Russell St. West Lafayette IN 47906 USA;

    USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory 275 S Russell St. West Lafayette IN 47906 USA;

    USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory 275 S Russell St. West Lafayette IN 47906 USA Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100101 China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Surface coverage; Spatial distribution; Particle size distribution; Erosion regimes; SOC loss;

    机译:表面覆盖;空间分布;粒度分布;侵蚀制度;SOC损失;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号