...
首页> 外文期刊>Science of the total environment >Effect of water velocity on the uptake of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) by silicone rubber (SR) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) passive samplers: An assessment of the efficiency of performance reference compounds (PRCs) in river-like flow conditions
【24h】

Effect of water velocity on the uptake of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) by silicone rubber (SR) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) passive samplers: An assessment of the efficiency of performance reference compounds (PRCs) in river-like flow conditions

机译:水速对硅橡胶(SR)和低密度聚乙烯(LDPE)被动采样器对多氯联苯(PCBs)吸收的影响:对类似河流的流动条件下性能参考化合物(PRC)效率的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One aim of this study is to determine the impact of water velocity on the uptake of indicator polychlorinated biphenyls (iPCBs) by silicone rubber (SR) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) passive samplers. A second aim is to assess the efficiency of performance reference compounds (PRCs) to correct for the impact of water velocity. SR and LDPE samplers were spiked with 11 or 12 PRCs and exposed for 6 weeks to four different velocities (in the range of 1.6 to 37.7 cms~(-1)) in river-like flow conditions using a channel system supplied with river water. A relationship between velocity and the uptake was found for each iPCB and enables to determine expected changes in the uptake due to velocity variations. For both samplers, velocity increases from 2 to 10 cm s~(-1), 30 cm s~(-1) (interpolated data) and 100 cm s~(-1) (extrapolated data) lead to increases of the uptake which do not exceed a factor of 2,3 and 4.5, respectively. Results also showed that the influence of velocity decreased with increasing the octanol-water coefficient partition (log K_(ow)) of iPCBs when SR is used whereas the opposite effect was observed for LDPE. Time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations of iPCBs in water were calculated from iPCB uptake and PRC release. These calculations were performed using either a single PRC or all the PRCs. The efficiency of PRCs to correct the impact of velocity was assessed by comparing the TWA concentrations obtained at the four tested velocities. For SR, a good agreement was found among the four TWA concentrations with both methods (average RSD <10%). Also for LDPE, PRCs offered a good correction of the impact of water velocity (average RSD of about 10 to 20%). These results contribute to the process of acceptance of passive sampling in routine regulatory monitoring programs.
机译:这项研究的目的之一是确定水速对硅橡胶(SR)和低密度聚乙烯(LDPE)无源采样器摄取指示剂多氯联苯(iPCBs)的影响。第二个目标是评估性能参考化合物(PRC)的效率,以纠正水速的影响。 SR和LDPE采样器加注了11或12个PRCs,并使用河流水供应的通道系统,在类似河流的流动条件下暴露于四种不同的速度(范围为1.6至37.7 cms〜(-1))6周。对于每个iPCB,发现了速度与吸收量之间的关系,并能够确定由于速度变化而引起的吸收量预期变化。对于两个采样器,速度从2 cm s〜(-1),30 cm s〜(-1)(内插数据)和100 cm s〜(-1)(内插数据)增加都会导致摄取增加,分别不超过2,3和4.5。结果还表明,当使用SR时,速度的影响随着iPCB的辛醇-水系数分配(log K_(ow))的增加而降低,而LDPE则观察到相反的效果。根据iPCB的吸收和PRC的释放量计算出水中iPCB的时间加权平均(TWA)浓度。这些计算是使用单个中华人民共和国或所有中华人民共和国进行的。通过比较在四个测试速度下获得的TWA浓度来评估PRCs校正速度影响的效率。对于SR,在两种方法的四种TWA浓度之间均发现了很好的一致性(平均RSD <10%)。同样对于LDPE,PRCS很好地校正了水速的影响(平均RSD约为10%至20%)。这些结果有助于常规监管监测程序接受被动采样的过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号