...
首页> 外文期刊>Science of the total environment >Analysis of the ecotoxicity data submitted within the framework of the REACH Regulation. Part 3. Experimental sediment toxicity assays
【24h】

Analysis of the ecotoxicity data submitted within the framework of the REACH Regulation. Part 3. Experimental sediment toxicity assays

机译:分析在REACH法规框架内提交的生态毒性数据。第3部分。实验性沉积物毒性测定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For the first REACH registration deadline, companies have submitted registrations with relevant hazard and exposure information for substances at the highest tonnage level (above 1000 tonnes per year). At this tonnage level, information on the long-term toxicity of a substance to sediment organisms is required. There are a number of available test guidelines developed and accepted by various national/international organisations, which can be used to investigate long-term toxicity to sediment organisms. However instead of testing, registrants may also use other options to address toxicity to sediment organisms, e.g. weight of evidence approach, grouping of substances and read-across approaches, as well as substance-tailored exposure-driven testing. The current analysis of the data provided in ECHA database focuses on the test methods applied and the test organisms used in the experimental studies to assess long-term toxicity to sediment organisms. The main guidelines used for the testing of substances registered under REACH are the OECD guidelines and OSPAR Protocols on Methods for the Testing of Chemicals used in the Offshore Oil Industry: "Part A: A Sediment Bioassay using an Amphipod Corophium sp." explaining why one of the mostly used test organisms is the marine amphipod Corophium sp. In total, testing results with at least 40 species from seven phyla are provided in the database. However, it can be concluded that the ECHA database does not contain a high enough number of available experimental data on toxicity to sediment organisms for it to be used extensively by the scientific community (e.g. for development of non-testing methods to predict hazards to sediment organisms).
机译:在第一个REACH注册截止日期之前,公司已提交了具有最高吨位(每年超过1000吨)物质的相关危害和暴露信息的注册。在此吨位水平上,需要有关物质对沉积生物的长期毒性的信息。有许多可用的测试指南已被各个国家/国际组织制定并接受,可用于研究对沉积物生物的长期毒性。但是,注册人也可以使用其他方法来解决对沉积物生物的毒性,而不是进行测试,例如:证据法的权重,物质的分组和交叉阅读法,以及针对物质的暴露驱动测试。目前对ECHA数据库中提供的数据的分析集中于所采用的测试方法和实验研究中使用的测试生物,以评估对沉积物生物的长期毒性。用于测试根据REACH注册的物质的主要指南是OECD指南和OSPAR协议,关于海洋石油工业中所用化学物质的测试方法:“ A部分:使用两栖类Corophium sp。进行沉积物生物测定”。解释为什么最常用的测试生物之一是海洋两栖动物Corophium sp.。总体上,数据库中提供了来自七个门的至少40个物种的测试结果。但是,可以得出的结论是,ECHA数据库没有足够多的关于沉积物生物毒性的可用实验数据,因此无法被科学界广泛使用(例如,开发非测试方法来预测沉积物的危害)生物)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号