首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Indoor air quality in green-renovated vs. non-green low-income homes of children living in a temperate region of US (Ohio)
【24h】

Indoor air quality in green-renovated vs. non-green low-income homes of children living in a temperate region of US (Ohio)

机译:居住在美国温带地区的绿色装修儿童与非绿色低收入家庭的室内空气质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Green eco-friendly housing includes approaches to reduce indoor air pollutant sources and to increase energy efficiency. Although sealing/tightening buildings can save energy and reduce the penetration of outdoor pollutants, an adverse outcome can be increased buildup of pollutants with indoor sources. The objective of this study was to determine the differences in the indoor air quality (IAQ) between green and non-green homes in low-income housing complexes. In one housing complex, apartments were renovated using green principles (n = 28). Home visits were conducted immediately after the renovation, and subsequently at 6 months and at 12 months following the renovation. Of these homes, eight homes had pre-renovation home visits; this allowed pre- and post-renovation comparisons within the same homes. Parallel visits were conducted in non-green (control) apartments (n = 14) in a nearby low-income housing complex. The IAQ assessments included PM_(2.5), black carbon, ultrafine particles, sulfur, total volatile organic compounds (VOCs), formaldehyde, and air exchange rate. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. None of the indoor pollutant concentrations were significantly different between green and non-green homes. However, we found differences when comparing the concentrations before and after renovation. Measured immediately after renovation, indoor black carbon concentrations were significantly lower averaging 682 ng/m~3 in post-renovation vs. 2364 ng/m~3 in pre-renovation home visits (p = 0.01). In contrast, formaldehyde concentrations were significantly higher in post-renovated (0.03 ppm) than in pre-renovated homes (0.01 ppm) (p = 0.004). Questionnaire data showed that opening of windows occurred less frequently in homes immediately post-renovation compared to pre-renovation; this factor likely affected the levels of indoor black carbon (from outdoor sources) and formaldehyde (from indoor sources) more than the renovation status itself. To reduce IAQ problems and potentially improve health, careful selection of indoor building materials and ensuring sufficient ventilation are important for green building designs.
机译:绿色环保住房包括减少室内空气污染物来源和提高能源效率的方法。尽管密封/拧紧建筑物可以节省能源并减少室外污染物的渗透,但不利的后果可能是室内源污染物的积累增加。这项研究的目的是确定低收入住宅区中绿色和非绿色房屋之间的室内空气质量(IAQ)的差异。在一个住宅区内,公寓采用绿色原则进行了翻新(n = 28)。装修后立即进行家访,随后在装修后的6个月和12个月进行家访。在这些房屋中,有8座进行了装修前的家访。这样可以在同一房屋内进行翻新前后的比较。在附近的低收入住宅区的非绿色(对照)公寓(n = 14)中进行了平行访问。 IAQ评估包括PM_(2.5),黑碳,超细颗粒,硫,总挥发性有机化合物(VOC),甲醛和空气交换率。使用线性混合效应模型分析数据。绿色和非绿色房屋之间的室内污染物浓度均无显着差异。但是,我们在比较翻新前后的浓度时发现了差异。装修后立即进行测量,装修后室内黑碳浓度平均为68​​2 ng / m〜3,而装修前家庭访问时为2364 ng / m〜3(p = 0.01)。相反,装修后(0.03 ppm)的甲醛浓度明显高于装修后的房屋(0.01 ppm)(p = 0.004)。问卷调查数据显示,与装修前相比,装修后立即开窗的家庭较少。这个因素可能对室内黑碳(来自室外)和甲醛(来自室内)的水平的影响大于装修状态本身。为减少室内空气质量问题并可能改善健康状况,对室内建筑材料进行仔细选择并确保足够的通风对于绿色建筑设计至关重要。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Science of the Total Environment》 |2016年第1期|178-185|共8页
  • 作者单位

    University of Cincinnati, Department of Environmental Health, P.O. Box 670056, Cincinnati, OH, USA;

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Environmental Health, Air Pollution and Respiratory Health Branch, 4770 Buford Hwy., N.E., MS-F60, Atlanta, GA, USA;

    University of Cincinnati, Department of Environmental Health, P.O. Box 670056, Cincinnati, OH, USA;

    University of Cincinnati, Department of Environmental Health, P.O. Box 670056, Cincinnati, OH, USA,Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH, USA;

    University of Cincinnati, Department of Environmental Health, P.O. Box 670056, Cincinnati, OH, USA;

    University of Cincinnati, Department of Environmental Health, P.O. Box 670056, Cincinnati, OH, USA;

    Harvard University, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA, USA;

    Columbia University, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Geochemistry Division, P.O. Box 8000, Palisades, New York, USA;

    University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, 465 Henry Mall, Madison, WI, USA;

    Harvard University, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA, USA;

    Columbia University, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Geochemistry Division, P.O. Box 8000, Palisades, New York, USA;

    University of Cincinnati, Department of Environmental Health, P.O. Box 670056, Cincinnati, OH, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Green renovation; PM_(2.5); VOC; Black carbon; Formaldehyde;

    机译:绿色装修;PM_(2.5);VOC;黑炭;甲醛;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号