...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Integrating the economic and environmental performance of agricultural systems: A demonstration using Farm Business Survey data and Farmscoper
【24h】

Integrating the economic and environmental performance of agricultural systems: A demonstration using Farm Business Survey data and Farmscoper

机译:整合农业系统的经济和环境绩效:使用农场商业调查数据和Farmscoper进行的演示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is a continued need to monitor the environmental impacts of agricultural systems while also ensuring sufficient agricultural production. However, it can be difficult to collect relevant environmental data on a large enough number of farms and studies that do so often neglect to consider the financial drivers that ultimately determine many aspects of farm management and performance. This paper outlines a methodology for generating environmental indicators from the Farm Business Survey (FBS), an extensive annual economic survey of representative farms in England and Wales. Data were extracted from the FBS for a sample of East Anglian cereal farms and south western dairy farms and converted where necessary to use as inputs in ‘Farmscoper’; farm-level estimates of nitrate, phosphorus and sediment loadings and ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions were generated using the Farmscoper model. Nitrate losses to water, ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions were positively correlated with food energy production per unit area for both farm types; phosphorus loading was also correlated with food energy on the dairy farms. Environmental efficiency indicators, as measured by either total food energy or financial output per unit of negative environmental effect, were calculated; greenhouse gas emission efficiency (using either measure of agricultural output) and nitrate loading efficiency (using financial output) were positively correlated with profitability on cereal farms. No other environmental efficiency measures were significantly associated with farm profitability and none were significant on the dairy farms. These findings suggest that an improvement in economic performance can also improve environmental efficiency, but that this depends on the farm type and negative environmental externality in question. In a wider context, the augmentation of FBS-type data to generate additional environmental indicators can provide useful insights into ongoing research and policy issues around sustainable agricultural production.
机译:继续需要监测农业系统对环境的影响,同时还要确保足够的农业生产。但是,可能很难在足够多的农场上收集相关的环境数据,而研究却往往忽略了最终决定农场管理和绩效许多方面的财务驱动因素。本文概述了通过农场经营调查(FBS)生成环境指标的方法,该调查是对英格兰和威尔士代表性农场的年度广泛经济调查。从FBS中提取了东英吉利谷物农场和西南奶牛场样本的数据,并在必要时进行了转换,以用作“农场主”中的输入;农场一级的硝酸盐,磷和沉积物含量以及氨和温室气体排放量的估算是使用Farmscoper模型得出的。两种农场类型的硝酸盐损失的水,氨和温室气体排放量与单位面积的食物能源生产成正相关;磷的含量也与奶牛场的食物能量相关。计算了环境效率指标,以食物总能量或每单位负面环境影响的财务产出来衡量;温室气体排放效率(使用任何一种农业产出衡量方法)和硝酸盐负荷效率(使用财务产出)与谷物农场的盈利能力呈正相关。没有其他环境效率措施与农场的获利能力显着相关,在奶牛场上也没有任何意义。这些发现表明,经济绩效的改善也可以提高环境效率,但这取决于农场类型和所讨论的负面环境外部性。在更广泛的背景下,通过增加FBS型数据来生成其他环境指标,可以为正在进行的有关可持续农业生产的研究和政策问题提供有用的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号