...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Contrasting responses of soil respiration and temperature sensitivity to land use types: Cropland vs. apple orchard on the Chinese Loess Plateau
【24h】

Contrasting responses of soil respiration and temperature sensitivity to land use types: Cropland vs. apple orchard on the Chinese Loess Plateau

机译:黄土高原耕地与苹果园对土壤呼吸和温度敏感性的不同响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

HighlightsContrasting responses of soil respiration andQ10to land use types in fragmented Loess PlateauCompared to the cropland, the lowerQ10in the apple orchard resulted from varied bacterial community structure and β-glucosidase and cellobiohydrolase activity.Lower C: N ratios in the apple orchard possibly contributed to its lowerQ10.Graphical abstractDisplay OmittedAbstractLand use plays an essential role in regional carbon cycling, potentially influencing the exchange rates of CO2flux between soil and the atmosphere in terrestrial ecosystems. Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration (Q10), as an efficient parameter to reflect the possible feedback between the global carbon cycle and climate change, has been extensively studied. However, very few reports have assessed the difference in temperature sensitivity of soil respiration under different land use types. In this study, a three-year field experiment was conducted in cropland (winter wheat,Triticum aestivumL.) and apple orchard (Malus domesticaBorkh) on the semi-arid Loess Plateau from 2011 to 2013. Soil respiration (measured using Li-Cor 8100), bacterial community structure (represented by 16S rRNA), soil enzyme activities, and soil physicochemical properties of surface soil were monitored. The average annual soil respiration rate in the apple orchard was 12% greater than that in the cropland (2.01vs.1.80μmolm−2s−1), despite that the averageQ10values in the apple orchard was 15% lower than that in the cropland (ranging from 1.63 to 1.41). As to the differences among predominant phyla, Proteobacteria was 26% higher in the apple orchard than that in the cropland, whereas Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria were 18% and 36% lower in the apple orchard. The β-glucosidase and cellobiohydrolase activity were 15% (44.92vs.39.09nmolh−1g−1) and 22% greater (21.39vs.17.50nmolh−1g−1) in the apple orchard than that in the cropland. Compared to the cropland, the lowerQ10values in the apple orchard resulted from the variations of bacterial community structure and β-glucosidase and cellobiohydrolase activity. In addition, the lower C: N ratios in the apple orchard (6.50vs.8.40) possibly also contributed to its lowerQ10values. Our findings call for further studies to include the varying effects of land use types into consideration when applyingQ10values to predict the potential CO2efflux feedbacks between terrestrial ecosystems and future climate scenarios.
机译: 突出显示 土壤呼吸和 Q 10 在破碎的黄土高原土地上的土地利用类型 与农田相比,较低的 Q 10 <苹果园中的/ ce:inf>是由于细菌群落结构的变化以及β-葡萄糖苷酶和纤维二糖水解酶的活性所致。 < ce:label>• 在苹果中降低C:N的比例rchard可能导致其较低的 Q 10 图形摘要 省略显示 摘要 土地使用在区域碳循环中起着至关重要的作用,可能会产生影响t中土壤与大气之间CO 2 通量的汇率地球生态系统。土壤呼吸的温度敏感性( Q 10 ),作为反映全球碳之间可能的反馈的有效参数循环和气候变化,已经被广泛研究。但是,很少有报告评估不同土地利用类型下土壤呼吸温度敏感性的差异。在这项研究中,在农田(冬小麦,普通小麦 L。)和苹果园(家蝇Malus domestica Borkh)于2011年至2013年在半干旱黄土高原。监测土壤呼吸(使用Li-Cor 8100进行测量),细菌群落结构(以16S rRNA表示),土壤酶活性以及表层土壤的土壤理化特性。苹果园的平均年土壤呼吸速率比农田高12%(2.01 vs。1.80μmolm − 2 s -1 ),尽管平均 Q 10 值比农田中的值(从1.63到1.41)低15%。关于优势种间的差异,苹果园中的变形杆菌比农田中高26%,而放线菌和酸性杆菌在苹果园中分别低18%和36%。 β-葡萄糖苷酶和纤维二糖水解酶活性为15%(44.92 vs。 39.09nmolh -1 g − 1 )和22%(21.39 对比。 17.50nmolh − 1 g -1 )在苹果园中比在农田中高。与农田相比,苹果园中的 Q 10 值较低,这是由于细菌群落结构和β-葡萄糖苷酶和纤维二糖水解酶活性。此外,苹果园中较低的C:N比(6.50 vs。 8.40)也可能导致其较低的 Q 10 个值。我们的发现要求进一步研究,在将 Q 10 值应用于以下因素时,应考虑土地使用类型的各种影响预测地球生态系统和未来气候情景之间潜在的CO 2 外流反馈。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Science of the Total Environment》 |2018年第15期|425-433|共9页
  • 作者单位

    State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University,Collaborative Innovation Center of Water Security for Water Source Region of Mid-line of South-to-North Diversion Project of Henan Province, Nanyang Normal University;

    State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University,Collaborative Innovation Center of Water Security for Water Source Region of Mid-line of South-to-North Diversion Project of Henan Province, Nanyang Normal University;

    State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University;

    State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University;

    Collaborative Innovation Center of Water Security for Water Source Region of Mid-line of South-to-North Diversion Project of Henan Province, Nanyang Normal University;

    State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University,Collaborative Innovation Center of Water Security for Water Source Region of Mid-line of South-to-North Diversion Project of Henan Province, Nanyang Normal University;

    State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University,Collaborative Innovation Center of Water Security for Water Source Region of Mid-line of South-to-North Diversion Project of Henan Province, Nanyang Normal University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Q10values; Land use type; Bacterial communities; Soil enzyme activities;

    机译:Q10值;土地利用类型;细菌群落;土壤酶活性;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号