首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Minimum tillage and residue retention increase soil microbial population size and diversity: Implications for conservation tillage
【24h】

Minimum tillage and residue retention increase soil microbial population size and diversity: Implications for conservation tillage

机译:最小耕作和残留量增加了土壤微生物种群的大小和多样性:对保护性耕作的意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A global meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of conservation tillage practices on soil microbial population size [based on microbial count and phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) measurements], diversity (Shannon index), and microbial community structure. Both no-tillage (NT) and NT plus residue retention (NTS) increased soil microbial count as compared with conventional tillage (CT). Bacteria, fungi, and actinomycete counts were 3%, 18%, and 28%, respectively, higher under the NTS treatment relative to the NT treatment, and 38%, 41 %, and 28%, respectively, higher in the CT plus residue retention (CTS) treatment than in the CT treatment. No-tillage, as compared to CT, increased total PLFAs by 11%. The concentration of fungal PLFAs was increased by 17% by NT as compared to CT, but was decreased by 52% by NTS as compared to NT. The actinomycete PLFA concentration was decreased by reduced tillage and CTS, compared to CT. Compared with CT, NT increased the Shannon index of the total microbial and bacterial communities by 4% and 6%, respectively. The bacterial count was negatively associated with mean annual precipitation (275-1624 ㎜) and experimental duration (1-35 years) and positively associated with initial total soil nitrogen concentration. Overall, relative to CT, minimum tillage alone increased soil microbial count, fungal biomass, and bacterial diversity; residue retention alone increased soil microbial count and fungal diversity, and decreased the biomass of actinomycetes; combining minimum tillage and residue retention increased soil microbial count and fungal diversity. We conclude that the response to minimum tillage and residue retention was consistently positive for soil microbial count but was context dependent for microbial biomass, diversity, and community structure.
机译:进行了一项全球荟萃分析,以评估保护性耕作方式对土壤微生物种群规模的影响[基于微生物计数和磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)测量],多样性(香农指数)和微生物群落结构。与常规耕作(CT)相比,免耕(NT)和NT加残留物保留(NTS)均增加了土壤微生物数量。在NTS处理下,细菌,真菌和放线菌的计数分别比在NT处理下高3%,18%和28%,在CT加残留物中分别高38%,41%和28%。保留(CTS)治疗要比CT治疗好。与CT相比,免耕使PLFA总量增加了11%。与CT相比,NT可使真菌PLFA的浓度增加17%,而与NT相比,NTS可使真菌PLFA的浓度减少52%。与CT相比,减少耕作和CTS可以降低放线菌PLFA的浓度。与CT相比,NT将总微生物和细菌群落的Shannon指数分别提高了4%和6%。细菌数量与年平均降水量(275-1624㎜)和实验时间(1-35年)呈负相关,与初始土壤总氮浓度呈正相关。总体而言,相对于CT而言,仅进行最小耕种就能增加土壤微生物数量,真菌生物量和细菌多样性。单靠残留物保留会增加土壤微生物数量和真菌多样性,并降低放线菌的生物量。最小耕作和残留物保留相结合,增加了土壤微生物数量和真菌多样性。我们得出的结论是,对最小耕作和残留残留物的响应对土壤微生物数量始终是积极的,但对微生物生物量,多样性和群落结构的影响取决于环境。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Science of the Total Environment》 |2020年第may10期|137164.1-137164.9|共9页
  • 作者单位

    The State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems Lanzhou University College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology Lanzhou 730020 China Department of Soil and Physical Sciences Lincoln University Lincoln 7647 New Zealand Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research Lincoln 7640 New Zealand;

    The State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems Lanzhou University College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology Lanzhou 730020 China;

    State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture Zhejiang A&F University Hangzhou 311300 China;

    State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture Zhejiang A&F University Hangzhou 311300 China Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta T6G 2E3 Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Conservation agriculture; Microbial count; Microbial diversity; PLFA; Soil property;

    机译:保护性农业;微生物数量微生物多样性;PLFA;土壤性质;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 05:27:51

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号