...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Straw mulch as an alternative to plastic film mulch: Positive evidence from dryland wheat production on the Loess Plateau
【24h】

Straw mulch as an alternative to plastic film mulch: Positive evidence from dryland wheat production on the Loess Plateau

机译:秸秆覆盖替代塑料覆盖:黄土高原旱地小麦生产的积极证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A large body of research has emphasized how plastic mulching can benefit crop yields in dryland areas. However, this practice's pollution of the soil, air and environment has only recently attracted attention. We conducted a five-year field experiment with winter wheat as a test crop to evaluate whether plastic mulching can be replaced with straw mulching in dryland areas of the Loess Plateau in China. The obtained results showed that straw mulching (SM) resulted in similar grain yields that were comparable with plastic mulching. More specifically, ridge-furrow plastic mulching plus furrow seeding (RM + FS), whole field plastic mulching (PM) and SM treatments resulted in average yields of 5950,6447 and 6246 kg ha(-1), respectively. No soil water storage difference was observed at harvest, but SM retained more water during summer fallow and then stored more water prior to seeding, 26 mm and 27 mm higher that of PM, and 44 mm and 46 mm higher that of RM + FS, respectively. None of the three treatments caused soil nitrate-N leaching. Furthermore, because straw is a potential source of slow-releasing N, the SM 0-200 cm soil profile contained significantly more nitrate-N than the corresponding RM FS and PM soil profiles. The SM treatment decreased greenhouse gas emissions intensity (GHGI) by 47% and 40% and increased economic return by 13% and 27% when compared to the PM and RM + FS treatments, respectively. Therefore, an optimized SM system is a viable alternative for increasing crop yields in dryland wheat production that avoids the negative impacts of the increasingly popular plastic mulching approach. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:大量的研究都强调了地膜覆盖如何使干旱地区的农作物增产。然而,这种做法对土壤,空气和环境的污染直到最近才引起注意。我们以冬小麦为试验作物进行了为期五年的田间试验,以评估在中国黄土高原干旱地区是否可以用秸秆覆盖代替塑料覆盖。获得的结果表明,秸秆覆盖(SM)可产生与塑料覆盖相当的谷物产量。更具体地说,垄沟地膜覆盖+沟播(RM + FS),全田地膜覆盖(PM)和SM处理分别导致平均产量5950、6447和6246 kg ha(-1)。收获时没有观察到土壤储水量的差异,但是SM在夏季休耕期间保留了更多的水,然后在播种前储存了更多的水,PM分别高出26 mm和27 mm,RM + FS高出44 mm和46 mm,分别。三种处理均未引起土壤硝态氮淋失。此外,由于秸秆是缓慢释放氮的潜在来源,因此,SM 0-200 cm土壤剖面比相应的RM FS和PM土壤剖面含有更多的硝态氮。与PM和RM + FS处理相比,SM处理分别将温室气体排放强度(GHGI)降低了47%和40%,并将经济收益提高了13%和27%。因此,优化的SM系统是在旱地小麦生产中提高作物产量的可行替代方案,避免了日益流行的塑料覆盖方法带来的负面影响。 (C)2019 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号