...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Policy-driven monitoring and evaluation: Does it support adaptive management of socio-ecological systems?
【24h】

Policy-driven monitoring and evaluation: Does it support adaptive management of socio-ecological systems?

机译:由政策驱动的监测和评估:它是否支持对社会生态系统的适应性管理?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Inadequate Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) is often thought to hinder adaptive management of socio-ecological systems. A key influence on environmental management practices are environmental policies: however, their consequences for M&E practices have not been well-examined.We examine three policy areas - the Water Framework Directive, the Natura 2000 Directives, and the Agri-Environment Schemes of the Common Agricultural Policy - whose statutory requirements influence how the environment is managed and monitored across Europe. We use a comparative approach to examine what is monitored, how monitoring is carried out, and how results are used to update management, based on publicly available documentation across nine regional and national cases.The requirements and guidelines of these policies have provided significant impetus for monitoring: however, we find this policy-driven M&E usually does not match the ideals of what is needed to inform adaptive management. There is a tendency to focus on understanding state and trends rather than tracking the effect of interventions; a focus on specific biotic and abiotic indicators at the expense of understanding system functions and processes, especially social components; and limited attention to how context affects systems, though this is sometimes considered via secondary data. The resulting data are sometimes publicly-accessible, but it is rarely clear if and how these influence decisions at any level, whether this be in the original policy itself or at the level of measures such as site management plans.Adjustments to policy-driven M&E could better enable learning for adaptive management, by reconsidering what supports a balanced understanding of socio-ecological systems and decision-making. Useful strategies include making more use of secondary data, and more transparency in data-sharing and decision-making. Several countries and policy areas already offer useful examples. Such changes are essential given the influence of policy, and the urgency of enabling adaptive management to safeguard socio-ecological systems. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:人们常常认为监测与评估(M&E)不足会阻碍对社会生态系统的适应性管理。对环境管理实践的关键影响是环境政策:然而,其对监督与评估实践的后果尚未得到充分研究。我们研究了三个政策领域:水框架指令,Natura 2000指令和共同农业环境计划。农业政策-其法规要求会影响整个欧洲环境的管理和监控方式。我们基于9个地区和国家案例的公开文档,使用比较方法来检查要监视的内容,如何执行监视以及如何使用结果更新管理,这些政策的要求和指导方针为监控:但是,我们发现这种由策略驱动的M&E通常与提供自适应管理所需的理想不符。有一种趋势是专注于了解状态和趋势,而不是跟踪干预措施的效果。专注于特定的生物和非生物指标,以了解系统功能和过程,尤其是社会组成部分为代价;尽管对上下文的影响有时会通过辅助数据来考虑,但对上下文如何影响系统的关注却很少。生成的数据有时可以公开获取,但是很少知道这些数据是否以及如何影响任何级别的决策,无论是在原始策略本身还是在站点管理计划等措施级别。通过重新考虑支持对社会生态系统和决策的平衡理解的因素,可以更好地为适应性管理学习。有用的策略包括更多地使用辅助数据,以及在数据共享和决策中提高透明度。几个国家和政策领域已经提供了有用的例子。考虑到政策的影响以及迫切需要进行适应性管理以维护社会生态系统的情况,此类变化至关重要。 (C)2019作者。由Elsevier B.V.发布

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Science of the Total Environment》 |2019年第20期|373-384|共12页
  • 作者单位

    James Hutton Inst, Social Econ & Geog Sci, Cragiebuckler AB15 8QH, Scotland;

    James Hutton Inst, Social Econ & Geog Sci, Cragiebuckler AB15 8QH, Scotland;

    James Hutton Inst, Social Econ & Geog Sci, Cragiebuckler AB15 8QH, Scotland|Univ Reading, Sch Agr Policy & Dev, Agr Bldg, Reading RG6 6AR, Berks, England;

    Univ Bucharest, Dept Syst Ecol & Sustainabil, 91-95 Spl Independentei, Bucharest 050095, Romania;

    Hungarian Acad Sci, Ctr Ecol Res, Inst Ecol & Bot, Alkotmany U 2-4, H-2163 Vacratot, Hungary;

    Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Aquat Sci & Assessment, Box 7050, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden;

    Slovak Acad Sci, Inst Landscape Ecol, Stefanikova 3, Bratislava 81499, Slovakia;

    Estonian Univ Life Sci, Inst Agr & Environm Sci, Kreutzwaldi 5, EE-51006 Tartu, Estonia;

    James Hutton Inst, Informat & Computat Sci, Cragiebuckler AB15 8QH, Scotland;

    Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Programme Environm Informat, Survontie 9a, Jyvaskyla 40500, Finland;

    Univ Bucharest, Dept Syst Ecol & Sustainabil, 91-95 Spl Independentei, Bucharest 050095, Romania;

    Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Ctr Res Ecol & Forestry Applicat CREAF, E-08193 Catalonia, Cerdanyola Del, Spain;

    Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Programme Environm Informat, Survontie 9a, Jyvaskyla 40500, Finland;

    Univ Bucharest, Dept Syst Ecol & Sustainabil, 91-95 Spl Independentei, Bucharest 050095, Romania;

    Slovak Acad Sci, Inst Landscape Ecol, Stefanikova 3, Bratislava 81499, Slovakia;

    Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Freshwater Ctr, POB 140, Helsinki 00251, Finland;

    Slovak Acad Sci, Inst Landscape Ecol, Stefanikova 3, Bratislava 81499, Slovakia;

    Estonian Univ Life Sci, Inst Agr & Environm Sci, Kreutzwaldi 5, EE-51006 Tartu, Estonia;

    Res Inst Nat & Forest INBO, Havenlaan 88 Bus 73, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Adaptive management; Environmental governance; Policy; Monitoring evaluation; Socio-ecological systems; Sustainability;

    机译:适应性管理;环境治理;政策;监测与评估;社会生态系统;可持续性;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号