...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >White-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) feathers from Norway are suitable for monitoring of legacy, but not emerging contaminants
【24h】

White-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) feathers from Norway are suitable for monitoring of legacy, but not emerging contaminants

机译:挪威的白尾鹰(Haliaeetus albicilla)羽毛适用于监测遗留物,但不适用于新兴污染物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While feathers have been successfully validated for monitoring of internal concentrations of heavy metals and legacy persistent organic pollutants (POPs), less is known about their suitability for monitoring of emerging contaminants (ECs). Our study presents a broad investigation of both legacy POPs and ECs in non-destructive matrices from a bird of prey. Plasma and feathers were sampled in 2015 and 2016 from 70 whitetailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) nestlings from two archipelagos in Norway. Preen oil was also sampled in 2016. Samples were analysed for POPs (polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and organochlorinated pesticides (OCPs)) and ECs (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), dechlorane plus (DPs), phosphate and novel brominated flame retardants (PFRs and NBFRs)). A total of nine PCBs, three OCPs, one PBDE and one PFAS were detected in over 50% of the plasma and feather samples within each sampling year and location.Significant and positive correlations were found between plasma, feathers and preen oil concentrations of legacy POPs and confirm the findings of previous research on the usefulness of these matrices for non-destructive monitoring. In contrast, the suitability of feathers for ECs seems to be limited. Detection frequencies (DF) of PFASs were higher in plasma (mean DF: 78%) than in feathers (mean DF: 38%). Only perfluoroundecanoic acid could be quantified in over 50% of both plasma and feather samples, yet their correlation was poor and not significant. The detection frequencies of PFRs, NBFRs and DPs were very low in plasma (mean DF: 1-13%), compared to feathers (mean DF: 10-57%). This may suggest external atmospheric deposition, rapid internal biotransformation or excretion of these compounds. Accordingly, we suggest prioritising plasma for PFASs analyses, while the sources of PFRs, NBFRs and DPs in feathers and plasma need further investigation. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:尽管羽毛已经成功通过验证,可以监测内部重金属和传统持久性有机污染物(POPs)的浓度,但人们对其羽毛是否适合监测新兴污染物(EC)的知之甚少。我们的研究对猛禽的非破坏性基质中的传统POP和EC进行了广泛的研究。 2015年和2016年从挪威两个群岛的70只白尾鹰(Haliaeetus albicilla)雏鸟中抽取了血浆和羽毛。还对Preen油在2016年进行了采样。分析了样品中的POPs(多氯联苯(PCBs),多溴联苯醚(PBDEs)和有机氯农药(OCPs))和ECs(全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFASs),十氯加(DPs)) ,磷酸盐和新型溴化阻燃剂(PFR和NBFR))。在每个采样年和地点,在超过50%的血浆和羽毛样品中共检测到9种多氯联苯,三种OCP,一种多溴二苯醚和一种全氟辛烷磺酸,血浆,羽毛和旧有持久性有机污染物的含油量之间存在显着正相关并确认先前关于这些矩阵对无损监测的有用性的研究结果。相反,羽毛对EC的适用性似乎受到限制。血浆中PFAS的检测频率(DF)(平均DF:78%)高于羽毛(平均DF:38%)。在血浆和羽毛样品中,只有超过50%的全氟十一烷酸可以定量,但它们之间的相关性较差且不显着。与羽毛(平均DF:10-57%)相比,血浆中PFR,NBFR和DP的检测频率非常低(平均DF:1-13%)。这可能表明这些化合物的外部大气沉积,内部快速生物转化或排泄。因此,我们建议将血浆优先用于PFAS分析,而羽毛和血浆中PFR,NBFR和DP的来源需要进一步研究。 (C)2018 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号