首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Chemical composition and source apportionment of PM_1 and PM_(2.5) in a national coal chemical industrial base of the Golden Energy Triangle, Northwest China
【24h】

Chemical composition and source apportionment of PM_1 and PM_(2.5) in a national coal chemical industrial base of the Golden Energy Triangle, Northwest China

机译:西北金能源三角国家煤化工基地PM_1和PM_(2.5)的化学组成及来源解析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As part of the Energy Golden Triangle in northwest China and the largest coal-to-liquids industry in the world, the emission and contamination of fine particles in the Ningdong National Energy and Chemical Industrial Base (NECIB) are unknown. There are also large knowledge gaps in the association of air pollution with coal-to-liquids industry. This paper reports the chemical composition and source apportionment of PM1 and PM2.5 collected at two industrial sites Yinglite (YLT) and Baofeng (BF) from a field campaign during summer 2016 and winter 2017. Major chemical components in PM1 and PM2.5, including carbonaceous aerosols, water-soluble inorganic ions, and metal elements were analyzed. The Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) model and the ISORROPIA II thermodynamic equilibrium model were used to track possible sources and contributions of these chemical components to the formation of the two fine particles. The results identified four primary sources of the fine particles, including vehicle emissions, biomass burning and waste incineration, the secondary aerosols and coal combustion, and soil dust. The PM1 and PM2.5 concentrations were higher in winter than summer. The summed secondary inorganic and carbonaceous aerosols accounted for 36.1-40.0% of PM2.5 mass. The total mass of chemical components identified in the source apportionment only explained about 64.2 to 72.4% of the PM2.5 mass. These results imply some missing sources in this large-scale coal chemical industry base. A coupled weather forecasting and atmospheric chemistry model WRF-Chem was employed to simulate the PM2.5 mass and concentrations of OC and EC, and to examine the origins of PM2.5 across the NECIB. The modeled concentrations of OC and EC were consistent with the sampled data, but the modeled mass of PM2.5 is lower considerably than the measurements, again suggesting unknown sources of fine particles in this energy industrial base. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:作为中国西北部的能源金三角和世界上最大的煤制油工业的一部分,宁东国家能源和化学工业基地(NECIB)的细颗粒物的排放和污染情况尚不清楚。空气污染与煤制油工业之间的联系也存在很大的知识空白。本文报告了在2016年夏季和2017年冬季通过一次野外活动在英利特(YLT)和宝丰(BF)两个工业地点收集到的PM1和PM2.5的化学成分和来源分配。PM1和PM2.5中的主要化学成分分析了碳质气溶胶,水溶性无机离子和金属元素。使用正矩阵分解(PMF)模型和ISORROPIA II热力学平衡模型来跟踪这些化学成分对两个细颗粒形成的可能来源和贡献。结果确定了四个主要的细颗粒来源,包括车辆排放,生物质燃烧和废物焚烧,二次气溶胶和煤燃烧以及土壤粉尘。冬季的PM1和PM2.5浓度高于夏季。无机和碳质气溶胶的总和占PM2.5质量的36.1-40.0%。源解析中确定的化学成分总质量仅解释了PM2.5质量的64.2%至72.4%。这些结果意味着在这个大型煤化工基地中缺少一些资源。结合天气预报和大气化学模型WRF-Chem来模拟PM2.5的质量以及OC和EC的浓度,并检查NECIB上PM2.5的来源。 OC和EC的建模浓度与采样数据一致,但PM2.5的建模质量明显低于测量值,再次表明该能源工业基础中未知的细颗粒来源。 (C)2018 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号