...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Multi-year double cropping biochar field trials in Nepal: Finding the optimal biochar dose through agronomic trials and cost-benefit analysis
【24h】

Multi-year double cropping biochar field trials in Nepal: Finding the optimal biochar dose through agronomic trials and cost-benefit analysis

机译:尼泊尔多年生双季生物炭田间试验:通过农艺试验和成本效益分析寻找最佳生物炭剂量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Poor water and nutrient retention are the major soil fertility limitations in the low productivity agricultural soils of Nepal. The addition of biochar to these soils is one way these hindrances can be overcome. In the present study, six different biochar doses (control, 5 t ha-1, 10 t ha-1, 15 t ha-1, 25 t ha-1 and 40 t ha-1) were applied to a moderately acidic silty loam soil from Rasuwa, Nepal and the effects on soil physicochemical properties and maize and mustard yield over three years (i.e., six cropping seasons), were investigated. Biochar addition did not show significant effects on maize and mustard grain yield in the first year, however significant positive effects (p < 0.01) were observed during the second and third years. During the second year, maize grain yield significantly increased by 50%, 47% and 93% and mustard grain yield by 96%, 128% and 134% at 15 t ha-1, 25 t ha-1 and 40 t ha-1 of biochar respectively. A similar significant increase in yield of both crops was observed in the third year. Yields for both maize and mustard correlated significantly (p < 0.001) with plant available P, K+, pH, total OC%, CEC, base saturation, and increased as a function of biochar addition. On the basis of the measured crop yields for the various biochar doses, a cost-benefit analysis was carried out, and gross margin was calculated to optimize biochar dose for local farming practice. Total costs included financial cost (farm input, labor and biochar production cost), health cost and methane emission cost during biochar production. Health costs were a minor factor (<2% of total biochar preparation cost), whereas methane emission costs were significant (up to 30% of biochar cost, depending on the C price). Total income comprised sale of crops and carbon sequestration credits. The cost-benefit analysis showed that the optimal biochar application dose was 15 t ha-1 for all C price scenarios, increasing gross margin by 21% and 53%, respectively, for 0 and 42 US$ per ton CO2 price scenarios. In the current situation, only the 0 US$ price scenario is realistic for rural farmers in Nepal, but this still gives benefits of biochar amendment, which are capped at a 15 t ha-1 biochar addition.
机译:尼泊尔低生产力的农业土壤中水分和养分滞留不足是主要的土壤肥力限制。向这些土壤中添加生物炭是可以克服这些障碍的一种方法。在本研究中,将六种不同生物炭剂量(对照,5 differentthaha-1、10 thaha-1、15 t ha-1、25 thaha-1和40 t ha-1)应用于中等酸性粉质壤土研究了尼泊尔拉苏瓦的土壤,以及三年(即六个种植季节)对土壤理化性质以及玉米和芥菜产量的影响。在第一年添加生物炭对玉米和芥菜籽产量没有显着影响,但是在第二年和第三年观察到了显着的积极影响(p <0.01)。在第二年中,15 tha-1、25 thaha-1和40 thaha-1的玉米籽粒产量分别显着增加了50%,47%和93%,芥菜籽粒产量分别增长了96%,128%和134%。生物炭。在第三年,两种作物的单产都有相似的显着提高。玉米和芥末的产量均与植物有效磷,钾,pH,总OC%,CEC,碱饱和度和生物炭添加量显着相关(p <0.001)。根据各种生物炭剂量的测得的农作物产量,进行了成本效益分析,并计算了毛利以优化生物炭剂量以适合当地的耕作方式。总成本包括财务成本(农场投入,劳动力和生物炭生产成本),健康成本和生物炭生产过程中的甲烷排放成本。卫生成本是次要因素(不到生物炭制备总成本的2%),而甲烷排放成本却很高(取决于碳价,高达生物炭成本的30%)。总收入包括农作物销售和碳固存额度。成本效益分析表明,在所有C价格情景下,最佳生物炭施用量为15 tha-1,在每吨CO2价格情景为0和42美元的情况下,毛利率分别提高21%和53%。在目前的情况下,对于尼泊尔的农村农民来说,只有0美元的价格是切合实际的,但这仍然带来了生物炭修订的好处,即以15thha-1的生物炭添加量为上限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号