...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >The use of a disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) metric to measure human health damage resulting from pesticide maximum legal exposures
【24h】

The use of a disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) metric to measure human health damage resulting from pesticide maximum legal exposures

机译:使用残疾调整生命年(DALY)度量标准来衡量农药最大合法暴露量对人体健康的损害

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Most agencies around the world have developed a separate regulation frameworks for pesticides with different modes of action, likely because of the lack of a uniform quantification for health damage, which may underestimate pesticides' impact on human health and disease burden. In this study, the disability-adjusted life-year, a uniform metric used to express the human health impact and damage, was used to measure theoretical health damage resulting from maximum exposure as permitted by law to the most widely used pesticides. The total human risk characterization factors computed from chlorpyrifos and diazinon standard values through main exposure routes are generally larger than that of other widely used pesticides, and most factors of chlorpyrifos exceed the upper bounds of health risk. In addition, the damages to human health quantified from soil legal exposure to these widely used pesticides are much lower than that from exposure to drinking water or foods, which could help derive exposure allocation factors for different exposure routes. A total of 412 (28.3% of the total) computed total risk characterization factors of the 13 pesticides exceed the upper bound of tolerable risk uncertainty. Some nations, such as those in Europe, have adopted uniform and strict pesticide standard values as well as some computed risk characterization factors presented in the consensus data cluster. In addition, the results of an analysis on the geographical distribution of health risk characterization factors indicated that European nations have provided more conservative pesticide standard values in general. It is hoped that regulatory agencies can apply this uniform metric to compare and formulate legal limits for pesticides that have different modes of action.
机译:全世界大多数机构已针对具有不同作用方式的农药制定了单独的法规框架,这可能是由于缺乏对健康损害的统一量化,这可能低估了农药对人类健康和疾病负担的影响。在这项研究中,使用残疾调整生命年(用于表示对人类健康的影响和损害的统一度量标准)来测量由于法律允许的对最广泛使用的农药的最大暴露而导致的理论健康损害。通过毒死rif和二嗪农标准值通过主要暴露途径计算出的总人类危险性表征因子通常大于其他广泛使用的农药,大多数毒死exceed因子都超过了健康危险的上限。此外,从土壤合法接触这些广泛使用的农药所量化的对人体健康的危害要远低于从饮用水或食品接触所造成的危害,这可能有助于得出不同接触途径的接触分配因子。 13种农药的总共412个(占总数的28.3%)计算出的总危险性表征因子超过了可承受的危险性不确定性上限。一些国家,例如欧洲的那些国家,采用了统一且严格的农药标准值以及共识数据库中提供的某些计算得出的风险特征因子。此外,对健康风险特征因素地理分布的分析结果表明,欧洲国家总体上提供了更为保守的农药标准值。希望监管机构可以应用这一统一的指标来比较和制定具有不同作用方式的农药的法律限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号