...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and Public Policy >Do public research organisations own most patents invented by their staff?
【24h】

Do public research organisations own most patents invented by their staff?

机译:公共研究组织是否拥有其员工发明的大多数专利?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Technology ownership and knowledge transfer aim at the dissemination of public research results, usually in one direction - from the university or public research organisation (PRO) that produced the results. However, the complementarities between these types of instruments are not clear compared to the bidirectional channels of knowledge exchange. We analyse one PRO in Spain, a country that is peculiar in terms of infrequent changes to the legislation on science and patents and a predominance of PRO-owned over PRO-invented patents, similar to the situation in the USA but different from that in most EU member states. Against this background, knowledge transfer (measured through PRO-invented patents) increases faster than technology ownership (measured through PRO-owned patents). This situation may be damaging to knowledge exchange (measured through PRO co-owned patents).
机译:技术所有权和知识转移的目的通常是向一个方向传播公共研究结果,即从产生结果的大学或公共研究组织(PRO)传播。但是,与双向的知识交流渠道相比,这些类型的工具之间的互补性尚不清楚。我们分析了西班牙的一个PRO,该国的科学和专利法规很少更改,并且PRO拥有的所有权超过了PRO发明的专利,这与美国的情况相似,但与大多数国家不同欧盟成员国。在这种背景下,知识转移(通过PRO发明的专利衡量)的增长速度快于技术所有权(通过PRO拥有的专利衡量)的增长速度。这种情况可能会损害知识交流(通过PRO共同拥有的专利衡量)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science and Public Policy 》 |2011年第3期| p.237-250| 共14页
  • 作者

    Joaquin M Azagra-Caro;

  • 作者单位

    INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera s, 46022 Valenica, Spain;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号