...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and Public Policy >Vulnerability in Technological Cultures: New Directions in Research and Governance edited by Anique Hommels, Jessica Mesman and Wiebe E. Bijker
【24h】

Vulnerability in Technological Cultures: New Directions in Research and Governance edited by Anique Hommels, Jessica Mesman and Wiebe E. Bijker

机译:技术文化中的脆弱性:研究与治理的新方向,由安妮克·霍梅尔斯(Anique Hommels),杰西卡·梅斯曼(Jessica Mesman)和维比·E·比克(Wiebe E. Bijker)编辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There have now been several decades of research dedicated to how risk assessment and management are insufficient or inadequate tools to address the ambiguous and multivalent ways in which our societies are intertwined with technological development and environmental contexts. This period has also seen the continual rise of the use of the concept of risk and the tools associated with it in all manner of governance spheres. One of the potential reasons for this disconnect is the lack of a strong alternative concept that is coupled to robust methodologies to directly relate the concept to the study of technology and governance. This book fills this void by turning our attention to the construction and governance of vulnerability in technological cultures.
机译:现在已经有数十年的研究致力于风险评估和管理如何不足或不足以解决我们的社会与技术发展和环境环境交织在一起的模棱两可的方式。在此期间,在所有治理领域中,风险概念及其相关工具的使用也在不断增加。造成这种脱节的潜在原因之一是缺乏强大的替代概念,而该概念又与将方法直接与技术和治理研究相关的强大方法相结合。本书通过将我们的注意力转向技术文化中脆弱性的构建和治理来填补了这一空白。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science and Public Policy》 |2015年第4期|594-595|共2页
  • 作者

    Sam Weiss Evans;

  • 作者单位

    Center for Science, Technology, Medicine, & Society, 543 Stephens Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号