...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and Public Policy >Unpreparedness and risk in Big Science policy: Sweden and the European Spallation Source
【24h】

Unpreparedness and risk in Big Science policy: Sweden and the European Spallation Source

机译:大科学政策的准备不足和风险:瑞典和欧洲散裂源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The politics of European collaborative Big Science are inherently uncertain. The European Spallation Source (ESS) for materials science, planned to be built in Sweden with a collaborative European funding solution that was recently finalized is the most recent example. Sweden has so far invested around one billion SEK (≈€110 million), taking a significant risk given these uncertainties and given Sweden's complete lack of experience in hosting such big labs. Tracing the Swedish government's investments in the ESS project, this article shows that so far, the Swedish ESS bid seems to be generally well funded, but that a long-term plan for the funding and a contingency plan for increased costs seem to be absent. This adds to the seeming unprepared-ness of Sweden and elevates the already quite high level of risk for Swedish science and science policy of investing in the ESS.
机译:欧洲合作大科学的政治本质上是不确定的。最近的一个例子是计划在瑞典建立的欧洲材料科学散裂源(ESS),该方案最近已完成了欧洲合作资金解决方案。迄今为止,瑞典已投资约10亿瑞典克朗(约合1.1亿欧元),由于存在这些不确定性,而且瑞典完全缺乏举办如此大型实验室的经验,因此承担了巨大的风险。追溯瑞典政府对ESS项目的投资,本文表明,到目前为止,瑞典ESS招标似乎总体上资金充足,但是似乎缺少长期的融资计划和应急成本增加计划。这加剧了瑞典看似措手不及的状况,并提高了瑞典科学和科学政策投资ESS的本已很高的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号