...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and Public Policy >Co-authorship as a proxy for collaboration: a cautionary tale
【24h】

Co-authorship as a proxy for collaboration: a cautionary tale

机译:作为合作代理的共同作者:一个警示故事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

International scientific collaboration has risen in the last two decades. Publications using megascience data must conform to 'rules of use' that have emerged to protect the intellectual property of the project staff. These rules enhance co-publication counts and citations and distort the use of co-publication data as a proxy for collaboration. The distorting effects are illustrated by a case study of the BRICS countries that recently issued a declaration on scientific and technological cooperation with specific thematic areas allocated to each country. It is found that with a single exception the designated research areas of collaboration are different to individual country specializations. The disjuncture between such 'collaboration' manifests as collaboration in mega-science astronomy and high-energy physics projects especially those of the Planck 2013 telescope and at CERN, Geneva. This raises questions of import to science policy, for the BRICS in particular, and the measurement of scientific collaboration more generally.
机译:在过去的二十年中,国际科学合作不断增加。使用巨型科学数据的出版物必须符合为保护项目人员的知识产权而出现的“使用规则”。这些规则增加了共同出版物的计数和引用,并扭曲了共同出版物数据作为协作代理的使用。金砖国家的案例研究表明了这种扭曲的影响,该案例最近在金砖国家发布了一项关于科技合作的宣言,其中有分配给每个国家的特定主题领域。发现除了单个例外,指定的合作研究领域与各个国家的专业不同。这种“协作”之间的脱节表现为大科学天文学和高能物理项目中的协作,尤其是普朗克2013望远镜和日内瓦CERN的协作。这就提出了对科学政策,特别是对金砖国家,以及更广泛地衡量科学合作的衡量标准的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号