...
首页> 外文期刊>Science & global security >Market Power in Uranium Enrichment
【24h】

Market Power in Uranium Enrichment

机译:铀浓缩的市场力量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Four firms dominate the international uranium enrichment market. Simultaneously, the nations that host enrichment facilities strongly discourage other nations from developing enrichment capacity, given its potential use in nuclear weapons production. Therefore, these four firms benefit from the exercise of national power to prevent entry into this market. This paper shows that these firms also benefit from increasing returns to scale. In similar national situations, this industry would be regulated or nationalized. This is because free markets do not necessarily lead to a socially optimal long-run equilibrium where the industry is necessarily concentrated, such that there is no proliferating entry, but is sufficiently diverse, so that no one national group can dictate prices, contract terms, or non-proliferation policy. Therefore, some form of international regulation might be necessary to discourage enrichment technology proliferation and assure enrichment supply at reasonable prices.
机译:四家公司主导着国际铀浓缩市场。同时,由于拥有浓缩设施的国家可能被用于核武器生产,因此强烈劝阻其他国家发展浓缩能力。因此,这四家公司得益于行使国家权力防止进入该市场。本文表明,这些公司还受益于规模收益的增加。在类似的国家情况下,该行业将受到监管或国有化。这是因为自由市场并不一定会导致社会最优的长期均衡,在这个均衡中该行业必定会集中,这样就不会有激进的进入,而是足够多样化,以至于没有哪个国家集团可以决定价格,合同条款,或不扩散政策。因此,可能需要某种形式的国际法规来阻止浓缩技术的扩散,并确保以合理的价格供应浓缩液。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science & global security》 |2009年第3期|132-154|共23页
  • 作者

    Geoffrey Rothwell;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-6072, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号