首页> 外文期刊>Science as Culture >Arts, Sciences and Climate Change: Practices and Politics at the Threshold
【24h】

Arts, Sciences and Climate Change: Practices and Politics at the Threshold

机译:艺术,科学与气候变化:实践与政治处于临界点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Within climate change debates, writers and scholars have called for expanded methods for producing science, for proposing strategies for mitigation and adaptation, and for engaging with publics. Arts-sciences discourses are one area in which increasing numbers of practitioners and researchers are exploring ways in which interdisciplinarity may provide a space for reconsidering the role of cultural and creative responses to environmental change. Yet what new perspectives does the arts science intersection offer for rethinking climate change? Which historic conjunctions of arts-sciences are most useful to consider in relation to present-day practices, or in what ways do these previous alignments significantly shift in response to climate change? The uncertainty, contingency, and experimentation necessarily characteristic of climate change may generate emergent forms of practice that require new approaches-not just to arts and sciences, but also at the new thresholds, or 'meetings and mutations' that these practices cross. Thresholds-narrated here through the figure of 'zero degrees'-offer a way to bring together sites of encounter, transformations, uncertainties, future scenarios, material conditions and political practices in relation to climate change. Such shifting thresholds and relations lead not to fundamental re definitions or demarcations of arts and sciences, arguably, but rather to shared encounters with politics. Drawing on philosophies of aesthetics and sciences elaborated by Jacques Ranciere and Isabelle Stengers, we point to the ways in which political possibility is entangled with aesthetic-material conditions and practices, and how recognition of these interrelations might enable 'collective experimentation' within both creative practices and climate sciences.
机译:在气候变化辩论中,作家和学者呼吁扩大生产科学的方法,提出缓解和适应战略以及与公众互动的方法。艺术科学话语是一个领域,越来越多的从业人员和研究人员正在探索跨学科的方式可以为重新考虑文化和创造性对环境变化的作用提供空间的方式。然而,艺术交叉学科为反思气候变化提供了哪些新观点?对于当今的实践,哪种艺术科学的历史性结合最有用,或者这些先前的方式在应对气候变化时会发生哪些重大变化?气候变化必然具有的不确定性,偶然性和实验性可能会产生新的实践形式,这些形式需要新的方法,不仅是艺术和科学的方法,而且还需要这些方法所跨越的新门槛或“会议和突变”。这里通过“零度”图描述的阈值提供了一种将遭遇,转变,不确定性,未来情景,物质条件和与气候变化相关的政治实践的场所聚集在一起的方法。这种不断变化的门槛和关系并没有导致对艺术和科学的根本性重新定义或划界,而是导致了与政治的共同遭遇。借鉴雅克·兰西埃(Jacques Ranciere)和伊莎贝拉·斯汀格(Isabelle Stengers)阐述的美学和科学哲学,我们指出了政治可能性与美学-物质条件和实践纠缠在一起的方式,以及对这些相互关系的认识如何在两种创造性实践中实现“集体实验”和气候科学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号