...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of Work, Environment & Health >Comparison of four peak spinal loading exposure measurement methods and their association with low-back pain
【24h】

Comparison of four peak spinal loading exposure measurement methods and their association with low-back pain

机译:四种脊柱负荷峰值测量方法的比较及其与下腰痛的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: This paper examines the performance of 4 different methods of estimating peak spinal loading and their relationship with the reporting of low-back pain. Conclusions: While all the methods detected significant odds ratios, they cannot all be used interchangeably For risk assessment at the individual level. Peak spinal compression, moment, and shear are important risk Factors for low-back pain reporting, no matter which measurement method is used.
机译:目的:本文研究了四种估计峰值脊柱负荷的方法的性能以及它们与下腰痛报告的关系。结论:尽管所有方法均检测到显着的优势比,但不能将它们全部互换使用以进行个体风险评估。无论使用哪种测量方法,脊柱顶压,力矩和剪切力峰值都是报告下腰痛的重要风险因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号