首页> 外文期刊>SAM advanced management journal >Wrongful Termination and the Expanding Public Policy Exception: Implications and Advice
【24h】

Wrongful Termination and the Expanding Public Policy Exception: Implications and Advice

机译:错误的终止和扩大的公共政策例外:含义和建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When employers dismiss an "at-will" employee, there is always the chance that the employee will bring suit for wrongful termination. However, until recently, tort damages (compensatory and punitive) were rarely awarded even if wrongful termination was proved unless the employer violated public policy. In 1998, California joined a handful of other state courts in expanding the potential for such costly damages by broadening the public policy exception (currently recognized by 42 states). Thus, without violating either statutory or constitutional provisons of the law, but only by violating administrative regulations of a federal agency, a company may violate public policy. Human resources managers need to move aggressively within their organizations to minimize potential liability for dismissals that may be held to violate public policy under current (or future) expanded definitions.
机译:当雇主解雇“随心所欲”的雇员时,总是有机会使雇员提起诉讼以终止不当的雇佣关系。但是,直到最近,除非证明了错误的解雇,否则除非雇主违反公共政策,否则很少判给侵权赔偿(补偿性和惩罚性)。 1998年,加利福尼亚州与其他一些州法院一起,通过扩大公共政策的例外范围(目前已获得42个州认可),扩大了产生此类高额赔偿金的可能性。因此,公司在不违反法律的法定或宪法规定的情况下,仅通过违反联邦机构的行政法规,才可以违反公共政策。人力资源经理需要在组织内部积极行动,以最大程度地减少因当前(或将来)扩展定义而可能违反公共政策而被解雇的潜在责任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号