...
首页> 外文期刊>Roads & bridges >TREATING THE BENDS
【24h】

TREATING THE BENDS

机译:处理皮带

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Whether or not you think OSHA should issue an ergonomic regulation, there should be no question as to the need for implementing an ergonomic program at your company or agency. A good ergonomic program provides many benefits, not the least of which is increased profits. A recent analysis by a leading U.S. insurer of claims by employers in the roadway construction industry revealed 28% of all injury claims resulted from ergonomic injuries—strains and sprains (primarily to the back, shoulders and wrists). Of course, these injuries cost employers lost work time, replacement worker recruiting and training expenses and higher insurance premiums. These costs are quite well known to most employers. What is less well known are the costs resulting from workplace inefficiency that could be corrected by a good ergonomics program.
机译:无论您是否认为OSHA都应发布人机工程学法规,对于在您的公司或代理机构中实施人机工程学计划的必要性,毫无疑问。良好的人机工程学程序可带来很多好处,其中最重要的就是增加利润。美国一家领先的保险公司对道路施工行业雇主索赔的最新分析显示,在所有伤害索赔中,有28%是由人体工程学伤害引起的—劳损和扭伤(主要是背部,肩膀和手腕)。当然,这些伤害使雇主损失了工作时间,替代工人的招募和培训费用以及更高的保险费。这些费用对于大多数雇主是众所周知的。鲜为人知的是,由于工作效率低下而导致的成本可以通过良好的人机工程学程序进行纠正。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Roads & bridges》 |2006年第1期|p.48-51|共4页
  • 作者

    BRADLEY SANT;

  • 作者单位

    American Road & Transportation Builders Association, Washington, D.C.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 公路运输;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号