...
首页> 外文期刊>Risk management and insurance review >Excess Insurers Not Bound To Settlement By Underlying Insurer Despite 'follow-form' Structure Of Excess Policies
【24h】

Excess Insurers Not Bound To Settlement By Underlying Insurer Despite 'follow-form' Structure Of Excess Policies

机译:尽管超额保单具有“跟随形式”的结构,但超额保险人并没有被底层保险人约束

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Coverage disputes involving excess insurers come in two general types-First, just as in the case of primary policies, issues arise whether a particular loss is covered under the terms of the excess policy. The second type are cases where the coverage question itself is not in dispute, but, rather, the relationship between the primary and excess insurers, and how their policies should interact, is tested. The second type often give rise to complex decisions, tied to specific policy language and circumstances surrounding the claim. For this reason, these cases do not always leave behind general rules that are easily applied to future disputes.
机译:涉及超额保险人的承保纠纷有两种一般类型:第一,就像基本保单一样,是否会在超额保单的条款中涵盖特定损失,也会引起问题。第二类是覆盖问题本身没有争议,而是主要和超额保险公司之间的关系以及他们的保单应如何相互作用的情况。第二种类型通常会导致复杂的决策,这些决策取决于特定的政策语言和围绕索赔的情况。因此,这些案件并不总是会留下容易适用于未来争议的一般规则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号