...
首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >Commentary on 'Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: Implications for Human Health Risk Assessment' by Krewski et al.
【24h】

Commentary on 'Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: Implications for Human Health Risk Assessment' by Krewski et al.

机译:Krewski等人对“ 21世纪的毒性测试:对人类健康风险评估的影响”的评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The main goal of Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy is to provide a practical means of evaluating the heath risks of chemicals. The vision is in stark contrast to the current situation, where the focus on apical testing in vivo is too expensive and too slow to keep up with ongoing influx of new chemicals into commerce. Key aspects of the vision are (a) in vitro evaluation of perturbations of toxicity pathways rather than in vivo evaluation of apical effects and (b) evaluation of dose response over relevant concentration ranges, as opposed to the current practice of focusing on doses that cause adverse effects in laboratory animals. While the NAS report lacks specifics on how the vision should be implemented, and even a precise definition of a toxicity pathway, its concern for a practical and dose-relevant approach to risk assessment is laudable.
机译:《 21世纪毒性测试:愿景和策略》的主要目标是提供一种评估化学品健康风险的实用方法。该构想与当前的情况形成了鲜明的对比,在当前的情况下,对体内根尖测试的关注过于昂贵且太慢,无法跟上不断涌入的新化学物质进入商业的步伐。愿景的主要方面是(a)体外评估毒性途径的扰动,而不是体内评估根尖作用;以及(b)评估相关浓度范围内的剂量反应,这与目前关注剂量引起的剂量相反。对实验动物的不良影响。尽管NAS报告缺乏有关如何实现视觉的详细信息,甚至缺乏毒性途径的精确定义,但值得关注的是实用和与剂量相关的风险评估方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Risk analysis》 |2009年第4期|480-481|共2页
  • 作者

    Rory B. Conolly;

  • 作者单位

    National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, MD B205-01, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号