...
首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >From the Editors
【24h】

From the Editors

机译:来自编辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We begin with a Letter to the Editor from Ted Yellman, who refers to recent articles about the definition of frequency by Tony Cox. He explains why he disagrees with Cox about the impossibility of defining frequency. Cox responds with the assertion that no definition can agree with both the ordinary meaning of frequency, and also apply to both nonexponential and exponential time distributions between events. B. John Garrick also writes a short response, noting that it is sometimes best to define terms in ways that allow the solving of a specific problem. The first article in the issue is an interesting perspective by Igor Linkov et al. that compares government use of weight of evidence (WOE) in decision-making with neuroscience research that shows that the human brain uses WOE processes to assess and value evidence. The authors consider how these parallels might be directed at improving organizational decision-making.
机译:我们从特德·耶尔曼(Ted Yellman)致编辑的信开始,他提到了托尼·考克斯(Tony Cox)关于频率定义的最新文章。他解释了为什么他不同意Cox定义频率的可能性。考克斯回应说,没有定义既可以与频率的一般含义相吻合,又可以应用于事件之间的非指数和指数时间分布。 B.约翰·加里克(John Garrick)也写了一个简短的答复,指出有时最好以允许解决特定问题的方式来定义术语。问题的第一篇文章是Igor Linkov等人的有趣观点。将政府在决策中使用证据权重(WOE)与神经科学研究进行比较,神经科学研究表明人脑使用WOE流程来评估和评估证据。作者考虑了这些相似之处如何直接用于改善组织决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号