首页> 外文期刊>RIBA Journal >ITS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE
【24h】

ITS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE

机译:这不是火箭科学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Time was when barely anyone, apart from Frank Gehry, knew what BIM actually meant. Now it's being banded around in the halls of government like it's going out of fashion. You've got to blame the chief construction advisor, Paul Morrell, for that. This is probably due to the construction success of the likes of Terminal 5, which as a precondition of appointment, tied all the consultants into taking up Building Information Modelling to provide the 3D model as well as 4D and 5D costs and scheduling. But Terminal 5 was a £4.3bn project, and all the parties were already major players — it doesn't necessarily mean BIM has the same kind of justifications when going from the macro to the micro scale.
机译:时间到了,除了弗兰克·盖里(Frank Gehry)之外,几乎没有人知道BIM的真正含义。现在,它像过时了一样在政府大厅里扎堆。您必须为此责怪首席建筑顾问Paul Morrell。这可能是由于5号航站楼之类的建筑取得了成功,这是任命的先决条件,它使所有顾问都参与了建筑信息建模,以提供3D模型以及4D和5D成本和进度安排。但是5号航站楼是一个耗资43亿英镑的项目,所有各方都已经是主要参与者-不一定意味着BIM从宏观到微观都具有相同的理由。

著录项

  • 来源
    《RIBA Journal》 |2011年第6期|p.61|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:22:01

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号