首页> 外文期刊>Rheumatology International >4 years after withdrawal of rofecoxib: where do we stand today?
【24h】

4 years after withdrawal of rofecoxib: where do we stand today?

机译:停用罗非昔布4年后:我们今天站在哪里?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On the 24th of October 2006, the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) stated that “it cannot be excluded that non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (nsNSAIDs) may be associated with a small increase in the absolute risk for thrombotic events”. Reviewing the most recent literature including meta-analyses of randomized clinical studies and pharmacoepidemiological studies show that this statement contrasts with the 2005 EMEA evaluation of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, which contained a number of regulations including several contraindications for coxibs. Recent clinical data indicate that the entire substance group of NSAIDs may have cardiovascular side effects but to different degrees. Results of basic research support these observations showing that the increase for cardiovascular risk not only depends on the ratio of inhibition of thromboxan and prostacyclin but also on other mechanisms including blood pressure elevation and cyclooxygenase independent actions. In clinical practice, many patients require anti-inflammatory therapy with NSAIDs but are at high cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risk. The combination of nsNSAIDs with proton pump inhibitors shows comparable safety to coxibs in averting upper gastrointestinal events, but evidence is increasing coxibs have advantages regarding lower gastrointestinal side effects. Concomitant therapy with aspirin is another issue. There is a negative effect on gastrointestinal safety, as well as the influence of nsNSAIDs on the cardioprotective effect of aspirin. As the contraindications for coxibs announced by the EMEA may prevent some patients from receiving optimal treatment, a warning for the entire substance group, as issued by the American Food and Drug Administration, with no contraindictions, would certainly be more reasonable.
机译:2006年10月24日,欧洲药品管理局(EMEA)表示:“不能排除非选择性非甾体抗炎药(nsNSAIDs)可能与血栓形成事件的绝对风险略有增加有关” 。回顾包括随机临床研究和药物流行病学研究的荟萃分析在内的最新文献后,发现该陈述与2005年EMEA对环氧合酶2抑制剂的评估形成了鲜明对比,环氧合酶2抑制剂包含许多法规,包括几种针对Coxib的禁忌症。最近的临床数据表明,整个非甾体抗炎药物质组可能有心血管副作用,但程度不同。基础研究的结果支持了这些观察结果,表明心血管风险的增加不仅取决于血栓素和前列环素的抑制率,还取决于其他机制,包括血压升高和环氧化酶的独立作用。在临床实践中,许多患者需要使用NSAID进行抗炎治疗,但心血管和胃肠道风险很高。 nsNSAIDs与质子泵抑制剂的组合在避免上消化道事件方面显示出与考昔布相当的安全性,但证据表明,考昔布在降低胃肠道副作用方面具有优势。阿司匹林的同时治疗是另一个问题。对胃肠道安全性以及nsNSAIDs对阿司匹林的心脏保护作用都具有负面影响。由于EMEA宣布的Coxib禁忌症可能使某些患者无法获得最佳治疗,因此,由美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)发出的针对整个物质类别的警告,如果没有任何矛盾,肯定会更加合理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号