...
首页> 外文期刊>Reviews on environmental health >Assessment of water, sanitation and hygiene in HCFs: which tool to follow?
【24h】

Assessment of water, sanitation and hygiene in HCFs: which tool to follow?

机译:评估HCF中的水,环境卫生和个人卫生:应遵循哪种工具?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) is important to improve and maintain the quality of health care services. Improving and managing WASH services require strong and consistent monitoring mechanisms to measure progress and direct efforts where needs are greatest. Although several tools are available to assess WASH in health care facilities (HCFs), there is always a dilemma among the program managers to select an appropriate tool for the assessment of WASH. Thus, it was aimed to perform a descriptive review of all available WASH assessment tools and assist in reaching a consensus for an optimal tool to assess WASH in HCFs. For this descriptive review, PubMed, ScopeMed and Google Scholar were used to search all available tools for the assessment of WASH. All the tools available online since 1991 till July 2018 were included in the review. Globally, nine different WASH assessment tools were retrieved. The majority of them have their self-limitations on the basis of 11 selected indicators and were examined in all the retrieved tools. There are variability and overlapping components within the specific tools. Very few survey instruments including human resource (HR), supply, budget, patient/staff satisfaction and documentation for appropriateness of WASH were found to be neglected. The majority of instruments were based on the subjective assessment of WASH validating with microbiological surveillance and photo documentation. The descriptive review suggests that various tools are available for the assessment of WASH but none of them seem to be complete with all indicators and to have consensus for the elements. Therefore, there is a need to develop a robust and comprehensive tool for the assessment of WASH in HCFs.
机译:水,环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)对于改善和维持医疗服务质量至关重要。改善和管理WASH服务需要强大且一致的监控机制,以衡量进度并在最大需求的情况下直接努力。尽管有几种工具可用于评估卫生保健机构(WCF)中的WASH,但在计划管理者中始终难以选择合适的WASH评估工具。因此,其目的是对所有可用的WASH评估工具进行描述性审查,并有助于就评估HCF中WASH的最佳工具达成共识。在此描述性评论中,使用PubMed,ScopeMed和Google Scholar搜索所有可用的工具以评估WASH。自1991年至2018年7月,所有可在线使用的工具均已包括在评估中。在全球范围内,检索了九种不同的WASH评估工具。它们中的大多数在11个选定指标的基础上有其自身的局限性,并在所有检索到的工具中进行了检查。特定工具中存在可变性和重叠部分。发现很少有人忽略包括人力资源(HR),供应,预算,患者/员工满意度和WASH适用性的文件在内的调查手段。大多数仪器基于对WASH的主观评估,并通过微生物监测和照片记录进行验证。描述性审查表明,可以使用各种工具来评估WASH,但似乎没有一个工具能够完整地代表所有指标,并且对要素没有共识。因此,需要开发一种强大而全面的工具来评估HCF中的WASH。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号