首页> 外文期刊>Review of world economics = >Has China replaced colonial trade?
【24h】

Has China replaced colonial trade?

机译:中国取代了殖民贸易吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

China is often suspected of taking over the extraordinary trade relationships that former colonies had within colonial empires. Besides preferential bilateral relationships built after independence, the two other potential determinants of the increase in trade with China are the improvement in China's export capacity and the natural redirection caused by independence. We investigate and quantify the three reasons that explain the level of former colonies' trade flows with China. Using structural gravity equations, we show that methodological issues can be largely responsible for displaying and estimating abnormally high trade levels between former colonies and China. Increased trade between these pairs of countries is the result of unilateral factors rather than more intense bilateral preferences. We then measure the reorientation of trade flows from former colonies' metropoles towards China and show that independence has produced the expected redistribution: trade flows with China would be 15% lower, had former colonies not become independent.
机译:人们常常怀疑中国接管了以前殖民地在殖民帝国中的特殊贸易关系。除了在独立后建立的优惠双边关系外,与中国贸易增长的另外两个潜在决定因素是中国的出口能力的提高和由独立引起的自然转移。我们调查并量化了解释前殖民地与中国贸易流量水平的三个原因。使用结构引力方程,我们表明,方法论问题可能在很大程度上负责显示和估算前殖民地与中国之间的异常高贸易水平。这些国家对之间贸易的增加是单方面因素的结果,而不是更强烈的双边优惠。然后,我们测量了从前殖民地大都会向中国的贸易流的重新定向,并显示了独立已经产生了预期的重新分配:如果前殖民地没有成为独立国家,那么与中国的贸易流将降低15%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号