...
首页> 外文期刊>Review of quantitative finance and accounting >The effects on investment incentives of an allowance for corporate equity tax system: the Belgian case as an example
【24h】

The effects on investment incentives of an allowance for corporate equity tax system: the Belgian case as an example

机译:公司股权税制度免税额对投资激励的影响:以比利时为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the past years, allowance for corporate equity (ACE) tax systems have become more popular even though they are still quite rare. An ACE tends to make a tax system neutral in respect of whether a company is financed by debt or equity. Less attention is given to the effects on investment incentives by scientific literature. We construct a model based on the principle of a hurdle rate to show whether and how an ACE system could change a company’s decision between distribution and reinvestment. The analysis is extended by implementing the so called fairness tax. We find that the influence of the fairness tax on (re)investment incentives depends on the debt to total capital ratio and the return on equity. Hence, the introduction of an ACE does only in certain cases lead to a change from distribution to reinvestment. Interestingly, the fairness tax can increase the incentive to reinvest in few situations and can make the ACE system more attractive in respect of reinvestment.
机译:在过去的几年中,尽管公司股权(ACE)税制仍然很罕见,但它变得越来越流行。 ACE倾向于就公司是通过债务还是股权融资来使税制保持中立。科学文献很少关注投资激励措施的影响。我们基于门槛费率原理构建模型,以显示ACE系统是否以及如何改变公司在分配和再投资之间的决策。通过实施所谓的公平税扩大了分析范围。我们发现,公平税对(再)投资激励措施的影响取决于债务与总资本之比和股本回报率。因此,引入ACE只会在某些情况下导致从分配到再投资的转变。有趣的是,公平税可以在极少数情况下增加进行再投资的动机,并使ACE系统在再投资方面更具吸引力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号