首页> 外文期刊>The Review of Network Economics >Competition For Versus In the Market of Long-Distance Passenger Rail Services
【24h】

Competition For Versus In the Market of Long-Distance Passenger Rail Services

机译:远程铁路客运市场的竞争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper is aimed at evaluating the net gains and trade-offs at stakernin implementing the competition of the rail mode in the long distance passengerrnmarket either by means of franchise or by an open access mechanism. Wernsimulate the outcomes of competition in and for the market using a differentiatedproductsrnoligopoly model allowing for inter- and intra-modal competition in arnlong distance passenger market. Specifically we first calibrate the model usingrndata describing high speed lines in France and show that the incumbent railwayrnoperator’s strategy does not simply boil down to a short-term profit maximizationrn(e.g. because of existing regulation or limit-pricing strategy). This yieldsrntwo important results when simulating competition. First, whether it is for or inrnthe market, the opening to competition does not guarantee a decrease in pricesrnin favor of passengers. Second, the effects of opening up to competition for thernmarket are relatively predictable and potentially positive, while those of openingrnup to competition in the market remain very uncertain.
机译:本文旨在评估通过特许经营或开放访问机制在长途客运市场中实施铁路模式竞争时所产生的净收益和权衡取舍。使用差异化的产品寡头垄断模型,Wern模拟市场中和市场中的竞争结果,从而在阿恩龙距离客运市场中实现模式间和模式内竞争。具体来说,我们首先使用描述法国高速铁路的数据来校准模型,并表明现任铁路运营商的策略并不能简单地归结为短期利润最大化(例如,由于现有法规或限价策略)。在模拟竞争时,这会产生两个重要的结果。首先,无论是为市场还是市场,开放竞争都不能保证降低价格对乘客有利。第二,对市场开放的竞争的影响是相对可预测的,并且可能是积极的,而对市场竞争开放的影响仍然非常不确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号